Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Reading: Sedge Foodplants Growing in the Cradle of Humankind, South Africa, and Cyperus Esculentus Tu...

Download

A- A+
Alt. Display

Research paper

Sedge Foodplants Growing in the Cradle of Humankind, South Africa, and Cyperus Esculentus Tubers (Patrysuintjies) as a C4 Superfood

Author:

Marlize Lombard

Palaeo-Research Institute, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, ZA
X close

Abstract

Since it was established that the early hominins of the Cradle of Humankind in South Africa ate 13C-enriched foods that may have included sedges with C4 photosynthetic pathways, much work has focused on the reconstruction of hominin dietary ecologies in both southern and eastern Africa. Through the years emphasis was placed on Cyperus papyrus as a possible source, even inspiring an ‘aquatic diet’ hypothesis for all hominins. Baboon feeding habits and sedge regimes observed in South Africa’s ‘Lowveld’ have provided a proxy for the dietary ecology of the southern ‘Highveld’ hominins, and from the Cradle of Humankind sedges, amongst other plants, have been collected for nutritional studies. To date, however, there has been no attempt to compile an inventory of the sedge species currently growing in the demarcated area of the Cradle of Humankind. Here I list 29 Cyperaceae taxa currently recorded as growing in the Cradle of Humankind. I show that, contrary to previous inference, most of them have C4 photosynthetic pathways and do not need aquatic ecologies or permanent wetland settings. I discuss and provide photographic records for the six species identified as current baboon and human foodplants, and highlight Cyperus esculentus as a possible nutritious and prolific C4-sedge-USO food source for southern African hominins based on its energy, protein and fat/lipid profile.

How to Cite: Lombard, M., 2022. Sedge Foodplants Growing in the Cradle of Humankind, South Africa, and Cyperus Esculentus Tubers (Patrysuintjies) as a C4 Superfood. Open Quaternary, 8(1), p.5. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/oq.110
78
Views
31
Downloads
7
Twitter
  Published on 18 Apr 2022
 Accepted on 10 Mar 2022            Submitted on 15 Sep 2021

Introduction

Much has been made of stable carbon isotope studies that provide evidence of a C4 component in early hominin diets (e.g., Cerling et al. 2013; Ungar & Sponheimer 2011; Lee-Thorp et al. 2012; Sponheimer et al. 2013; Levin et al. 2015). Such studies often focus on the underground/underwater storage organs (USOs) of sedges, in particular Cyperus papyrus (e.g., van der Merwe et al. 2008; Dominy 2012; Stewart 2014). So much so, that Wrangham et al. (2009) hypothesised that access to shallow-water aquatic habitats was not only a subsistence opportunity, but ‘a necessary condition’ for hominin adaptation to Savanna habitats. Yet, as Peters and Vogel (2005: 219) pointed out, most palaeo-environmental reconstructions of early hominin sites in South Africa do not support the presence of large wetlands even though carbon isotope analyses of hominin tooth enamel show ‘a significant but not dominant contribution of C4 biomass in their diets’. They suggested that the isotope signature for the Cradle of Humankind (henceforth also referred to as the Cradle) hominins could stem from a broad range of animal foraging (e.g., invertebrates, reptiles, birds, and small mammals), in combination with some C4 plant foods; concluding that the Cradle’s dryland environment probably restricted a greater reliance on a C4 plant diet, but that elsewhere large wetlands would have offered better opportunities for such subsistence behaviour (Peters & Vogel 2005).

Although several edible C4 grasses grow in the Cradle that may have contributed to the dietary signature (Lombard & van Aardt 2022), Peters and Vogel’s (2005: 219) observations seem to agree with Sponheimer et al.’s (2005) suggestion that aquatic habitats were probably too rare in South Africa to be important sources of sedge foods, but as Caley et al. (2018: 82) point out, ‘they only studied the sedges from four riverine sites located in the Kruger National Park and it remains unknown whether their conclusions are valid for the whole Limpopo catchment and larger scales’. Sedge USOs collected from the Cradle by Henry et al. (2019) showed rather high cellulose and hemicellulose values compared to various parts of other plants, and were apparently unreliable regarding antifeedant content so that the authors questioned whether the available sedge USOs may have provided an important food resource for the Cradle hominins. The full inventory of 223 foodplant taxa currently growing in the Cradle (Lombard & van Aardt 2022), however, shows that 23% of the plant parts collected and eaten by humans today are USOs – including some sedge tubers – and that 11.2% of the foodplants have C4 photosynthetic pathways.

Herries et al. (2010) also problematised the shallow-water habitat hypothesis of Wrangham et al. (2009) for the southern hominins on meteorological and palaeo-climatic grounds. According to them, the small riverine and vleiland seasonal wetlands of the southern African interior ‘are all shallow, with little open water, and dry up in winter’, including those in the Cradle, and well-developed sedge regimes are not abundant in the riverine environments of South Africa today, so that it is doubtful that wetlands were widespread during the Plio-Pleistocene (Sponheimer et al. 2005; Herries et al. 2010: 643). Reynolds and Kibii (2011) on the other hand, argue that the geo-morphology of the terrain around Sterkfontein Cave (Member 4), in combination with the biodiversity of its plant and animal records, suggest a riverine landscape that supported a gallery forest (also see Bamford 1999). They ascribe the presence of aquatic and wetland species in the Sterkfontein record as suggesting that ‘swamps’ used to exist in the region (also see Reynolds et al. 2011; Bailey et al. 2011). Another potential blow to a sedge dietary specialisation in the Cradle according to Sponheimer (2013: 231) is that ‘in environments roughly analogous to the ancient Sterkfontein Valley, the vast majority of sedges use C3 photosynthesis, so that even if the South African australopiths ate sedges, they might have needed to eat significant quantities of other C4 foods as well’.

Trying to reconstruct sedge populations that may have been part of the hominin dietary ecology in the Cradle of Humankind is not uncomplicated. For example, Murungi and Bamford (2020) highlighted the fact that the Cyperaceae family is the most diverse in Africa. Here Cyperus L. represents the largest genus consisting of more than 600 species occurring in a wide range of habitats (Larridon et al., 2011). Being so numerous, and with their classifications in continuous revision (see discussion in Muringi and Bamford 2020), it may be difficult to distinguish between the species collected for palaeo-scientific research. For example, Henry et al. (2019) collected numerous sedge samples, generating some nutritional data for them, but none were identified to species level, instead they were described as Kyllinga sp., Mariscus sp., unknown big sedge (Cyperus dives), unknown sedge, unknown sedge 2 (very small infl), and unknown small sedge BV. In sum, as Sponheimer et al. (2013: 10315) emphasise, the 13C-enriched resources that hominins ate ‘remain unknown and must await additional integration of existing paleodietary proxy data and new research on the distribution, abundance, nutrition, and mechanical properties of C4 (and CAM) plants’.

From the above four questions arise:

  1. What is the current sedge population of the Cradle of Humankind, and what proportion of these plants has a C4 photosynthetic pathway?
  2. Do all the Cradle sedges necessarily require aquatic habitats or extensive wetlands to thrive?
  3. Which of the Cradle sedge species are being used as foodplants by humans and/or primates today, and do these have C3 or C4 photosynthetic pathways?
  4. Is there a Cradle C4-sedge foodplant that stands out in terms of nutritional value in the way that it was claimed for C. papyrus in eastern Africa?

Study Area and Approach

To date, the dolomitic palaeo-caves located within the 51.5 thousand hectares of the UNESCO Cradle of Humankind World Heritage Site have yielded an abundant and varied hominin record, with more than 3300 fossil fragments including Australopithecus africanus, A. sediba, A. prometheus, Paranthropus robustus, and early Homo including H. habilis, H. naledi, H. erectus/ergaster and H. sapiens (pers. comm. Bernhard Zipfel and Stephanie Baker, 2019). Almost nowhere else do we find a similarly varied, but spatially confined fossil record spanning more than 2 Ma (Lombard & van Aardt 2022). The footprint of the Cradle of Humankind, located within the greater UNESCO Magaliesberg Biosphere, forms part of the ecotone between the Grassland and Savanna Biomes of southern Africa. The largest vegetation unit or veld type (i.e., a complex of plant communities ecologically and spatiotemporally occupying habitat complexes at the landscape scale [Mucina & Rutherford, 2011]) represented in the Cradle is the Carletonville Dolomite Grassland running through the centre of the Cradle landscape. This zone is bound by the Gauteng Shale Bushveld and Andesite Mountain Bushveld veld types to the northwest, including a narrow strip of Gold Reef Mountain Bushveld at its extreme north-western boundary. Pockets of the Moot Plains Bushveld encroach in the west, and the south-easterly boundary comprises pockets of Gold Reef Mountain Bushveld, Egoli Granite Grassland, and Andesite Mountain Bushveld (Mucina & Rutherford, 2011; Figure 1).

The footprint of the UNESCO Cradle of Humankind World Heritage Site within the Magaliesberg Biosphere and its associated veld types and approximate elevations
Figure 1 

The footprint of the UNESCO Cradle of Humankind World Heritage Site within the Magaliesberg Biosphere and its associated veld types and approximate elevations. Background maps by Matt Caruana, University of Johannesburg.

For plants – sedges or otherwise – to thrive in the Cradle of Humankind today they must be adapted to the summer-rainfall regime of southern Africa with heavy short-lived thunderstorms sometimes generating flash floods and raging veldfires by the end of the winter’s dry season. The mean annual precipitation is lowest on the Carletonville Dolomite Grassland (593 mm) and highest in the Gold Reef Mountain Bushveld (666 mm). The annual precipitation coefficient of the area is relatively high (26–28%). The mean annual potential evaporation is much higher than the mean precipitation ranging between 2086 mm in the Andesite Mountain Bushveld and 2388 mm on the Carletonville Dolomite Grassland. As a result, the mean annual soil moisture stress levels – the percentage of days when evaporative demand is more than double the soil moisture supply – are also very high ranging from 75% to 78% of the days (Table 1: all data from Mucina & Rutherford, 2011). Plant regimes are further narrowly linked to the soils or land types they grow in. I therefore provide information about these in the table below as additional context for the study area.

Table 1

General climatic and land-type indicators for the vegetation units associated with the Cradle of Humankind (data from Mucina & Rutherford, 2011). Key: MAP = mean annual precipitation, APCV = annual precipitation coefficient of variation, MAT = mean annual temperature, MFD = mean frost days with a screen temperature below 0°C, MAPE – mean annual potential evaporation, MASMS = mean annual soil moisture stress.


VEGETATION UNIT MAP IN MM AP-CV MAT IN °C # MFD MAPE IN MM % MASMS LAND TYPE

Carletonville Dolomite Grassland 593 28 16.6 37 2388 78 Freely drained, red and yellow, dystrophic/mesotropic, apedal soils comprise >40% of the land type.

Egoli Granite Grassland 682 26 16 29 2194 75 Red and yellow, dystrophic/mesotropic, apedal soils with plintic subsoils.

Moot Plains Bushveld 636 27 17 28 2373 77 Complex profile with: a) Freely drained, red and yellow, dystrophic/mesotropic, apedal soils; b) Black and red clays; c) Red and yellow, dystrophic/mesotropic, apedal soils with plintic subsoils.

Gold Reef Mountain Bushveld 666 27 16.4 26 2267 76 Rock outcrops with shallow soils and lime in some of the bottomlands.

Gauteng Shale Mountain Bushveld 661 27 15.6 33 2209 76 Rock outcrops with shallow soils and lime in some of the bottomlands.

Andesite Mountain Bushveld 660 27 15.6 34 2186 76 Rock outcrops with shallow soils and lime in some of the bottomlands, and some red and yellow, dystrophic/mesotropic, apedal soils with plintic subsoils.

The vegetation units and land types (Table 1) are underlain by the ancient geology of the Cradle landscape (e.g., Carruthers 2014), and several factors suggest that the current high relief of southern Africa has been in place since ~4 Ma (e.g., Partridge et al. 2010). The plateau uplift, in combination with global patterns in climate change, brought about the shift towards the now-typical cool winters and violent summer thunderstorms (Dirks & Berger 2013). Dirks et al. (2016) showed that the low basin-averaged erosion values for the Cradle indicate an old, slow-eroding landscape that did not change much during the last 3 Ma of hominin occupation (also see Makhubela et al. 2019). The relative stability of the Cradle hominin landscape is further reflected in the development of the Grassland and Savanna Biomes of southern Africa at the transition of the Pliocene towards the Pleistocene by ~3 Ma (Carruthers 2014; Neumann & Bamford 2015). Similar to today, the Cradle landscape hosted a variety of different habitats throughout the Plio-Pleistocene, including riparian, forested, edaphic and open grassland habitats – often in combination with each other (Watson 1993; Reed 1997; Sponheimer et al. 2005; Henry et al. 2019). Between ~3 Ma and 2.5 Ma an ‘El Niño-like state’ may have prevailed over southern Africa, likely characterised by pulses of intense rainfall and drought (e.g., Hopley et al. 2007). After ~1.8 Ma the region became increasingly dry resulting in the proliferation of C4-dominated grasslands (e.g., Scott 2002; Luyt & Lee-Thorp 2003; Lee-Thorp et al. 2007).

To compile a list of indigenous Cyperaceae currently growing in the Cradle that may serve as one of the proxies for palaeo-dietary reconstruction, I used Siebert and Siebert (2005), Eloff (2010), and the Flora of Southern Africa (FSA) Checklist (May 2021) provided by the South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI). I present basic information in terms of growth form, water dependency and distribution mainly using the African Plant Database (http://www.ville-ge.ch/musinfo/bd/cjb/africa/index.php?langue=an, consulted August 2021). I also noted maximum growth-height for each plant and the altitudes at which they occur habitually. The resulting list was then systematically assessed for any species that are known foodplants from current and/or recent human foraging records and/or baboon feeding contexts, as best-fit scenarios for hypothesising about hominin diets in southern Africa (e.g., Mogg 1975; Dunbar 1976; Vincent 1985; Peters et al. 1992; Codron 2003; Codron et al. 2008; Botha et al. 2019; Welcome & van Wyk 2019; Elton & Dunn 2020; Lombard & van Aardt (2022). For each of the sedge foodplants, I provide its general distribution in southern Africa as captured on the iNaturalist Research-grade Observations database (https://www.gbif.org/dataset/50c9509d-22c7-4a22-a47d-8c48425ef4a7 consulted August 2021), a basic description of the plant’s growth form and habitat and a brief discussion of their use as foodplants. Finally, I highlight one of the Cradle’s sedges as a ‘superfood’ that may have contributed, amongst other things, to the C4 signature in early hominin diet by comparing energy, protein and fat/lipids as basic nutritional values amongst African USO crops as well as South American potatoes.

Cyperaceae Growing in the Cradle of Humankind

There are currently 29 taxa belonging to 12 genera in the Cyperaceae family on record as growing in the Cradle of Humankind, one of which is not indigenous to southern Africa, namely Carex acutiformis. Ehrh. (Table 2). Perennial plants dominate the population with only two (Bulbostylis humilis and Isolepis cernua) being annual. The Cyperus genus is best represented (n = 11, 39%), followed by Carex (n = 4, 14%), Bulbostylis (n = 3, 11%), Scleria and Kyllinga are both represented by two (7%) species in the Cradle, whilst the Fimbristylis, Fuirena, Isolepis, Pycreus, Schoenoplectus and Schoenoxiphium genera each only have one species currently recorded for the Cradle (Figure 2a). Some of these lineages have considerable time depth, for example Bulbostylis dates back to 14.9 ± 4.7 Ma, Cyperus to 9.7 ± 1.3 Ma, and Fimbristylis to 9.1 ± 3.2 Ma (Besnard et al., 2009; Larridon et al., 2013; Sage, 2017), so that most of the Cyperaceae growing in the Cradle today could have been part of the Plio-Pleistocene hominin dietary ecology.

Table 2

Cyperaceae currently growing in the Cradle of Humankind. Key: BOT = Botswana; ESW = Eswatini; LES = Lesotho; NAM = Namibia; EC = Eastern Cape, South Africa; FS = Free State, South Africa; GA = Gauteng, South Africa; KN = KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa; LP = Limpopo Province, South Africa; MP = Mpumalanga, South Africa; NC = Northern Cape, South Africa; NW = Northwest Province, South Africa; WC = Western Cape, South Africa.


SPECIES/TAXA GROWTH FORM & PATHWAY WATER DEP. MAX HGHT ALTITUDE DISTRIBUTION

Abildgaardia ovata
(Burm.f.) Kral
Perennial herb, cyperoid, C4 Mesophyte 490 180–1830 BOT, ESW, NAM, EC, FS, GA, KN, LP, MP, NW

Bulbostylis burchellii
(Ficalho & Hiern) C.B.Clarke
Perennial herb, cyperoid, C4 Mesophyte 490 180–1830 BOT, ESW, NAM, EC, FS, GA, KN, LP, MP, NW

Bulbostylis humilis
(Kunth) C.B.Clarke
Annual herb, cyperoid, C4 Mesophyte 250 10–2955 BOT, ESW, NAM, EC, FS, GA, KN, LP, MP, NC, NW, WC

Bulbostylis oritrephes
(Ridl.) C.B.Clarke
Perennial herb, cyperoid C4 Mesophyte 450 200–2200 LES, ESW, EC, FS, GA, KN, LP, MP, NW

Carex acutiformis
Ehrh.
Perennial herb, emergent hydrophyte, C3 Helophyte 800 0–2440 Not indigenous, but occurs in LES, EC, FS, GA, KN, MP, NW, WC

Carex cognata
Kunth
Perennial herb, cyperoid, C3 Helophyte 800 10–2000 BOT, ESW, LES, NAM, EC, FS, GA, KN, LP, MP, NW, WC

Carex rhodesiaca
Nelmes
Perennial herb, emergent hydrophyte, C3 Helophyte 600 610–2225 ESW, LES, EC, GA, KN, LP, MP

Carex uhligii
K.Schum. ex C.B.Clarke
Perennial herb, cyperoid, C3 Mesophyte 600 120–1510 EC, FS, GA, KN, LP, MP, NW, WC

Cyperus austro-africanusC.Archer & Goetgh. Perennial herb, cyperoid Mesophyte 910 45–1731 ESW, NAM, EC, GA, KN, LP, MP, NW

Cyperus congestus
Vahl
Perennial herb, cyperoid, C4 Helophyte 910 2–2425 BOT, ESW, LES, NAM, EC, FS, GA, KN, LP, MP, NC, NW, WC

Cyperus esculentus
L. var. esculentus
Perennial herb, geophyte, cyperoid, C4 Mesophyte 100 5–2100 BOT, ESW, LES, NAM, EC, FS, GA, KN, LP, MP, NC, NW, WC

Cyperus fastigiatus
Rottb.
Perennial herb, cyperoid, C4 Helophyte 2590 5–1735 EC, FS, GA, KN, LP, MP, NC, NW, WC

Cyperus leptocladusKunth Perennial herb, cyperoid C3 Mesophyte 1750 393–2035 ESW, GA, KN, LP, MP, NW

Cyperus margaritaceus
Vahl var. margaritaceus
Perennial herb, cyperoid, C4 Mesophyte 750 12–2100 BOT, ESW, NAM, FS, GA, KN, LP, MP, NC, NW

Cyperus obtusiflorus
Vahl var. obtusiflorus
Perennial herb, cyperoid, C4 Mesophyte 450 5–1770 BOT, ESW, LES, EC, GA, KN, LP, MP, NW

Cyperus rotundus
L.
Perennial herb, geophyte, cyperoid, C4 Mesophyte 650 5–1370 BOT, ESW, NAM, EC, GA, KN, LP, MP, NC, NW, WC

Cyperus rupestris
Kunth var. rupestris
Perennial herb, cyperoid,
C4
Mesophyte 150 200–2375 ESW, LES, EC, FS, GA, KN, LP, MP, NC, NW

Cyperus sexangularis
Nees
Perennial herb, cyperoid, emergent hydrophyte, C3 Helophyte 1500 15–1500 BOT, ESW, EC, GA, KN, LP, MP, NC, NW

Cyperus uitenhagensis
(Steud.) C.Archer & Goetgh.
Perennial herb, cyperoid Mesophyte 300 20–2000 ESW, LES, EC, FS, GA, KN, LP, MP, NW, WC

Fimbristylis dichotoma
(L.) Vahl subsp. dichotoma
Perennial herb, cyperoid, C4 Mesophyte
/Helophyte
1260 10–1675 BOT, ESW, NAM, EC, FS, GA, KN, LP, MP, NW

Fuirena stricta
Steud. var. stricta
Perennial herb, cyperoid, sudd hydrophyte, C3 Helophyte 750 105–1670 BOT, ESW, NAM, GA, KN, LP, MP, NW, SWZ

Isolepis cernua(Vahl) Roem. & Schult. var. cernua Annual herb, cyperoid, C3 Helophyte 200 3–1830 LES, NAM, EC, FS, GA, KN, LP, MP, NC, NW, WC

Kyllinga alba
Nees
Perennial herb, cyperoid, C4 Mesophyte 520 85–2000 BOT, ESW, LES, NAM, EC, FS, GA, KN, LP, MP, NC, NW

Kyllinga melanospermaNees Perennial herb, cyperoid, C4 Helophyte 1000 5–1675 BOT, ESW, EC, GA, KN, LP, MP, NW

Pycreus unioloides(R.Br.) Urb. Perennial herb, cyperoid, C4 Helophyte 700 25–1950 BOT, ESW, LES, EC, GA, KN, LP, MP, NW

Schoenoplectus brachyceras(Hochst. ex A.Rich.) Lye Perennial herb, cyperoid, emergent hydrophyte, C3 Helophyte 500 850–2000 ESW, EC, FS, GA, KN, LP, MP, NW

Schoenoxiphium sparteum (Wahlenb.) C.B.Clarke Perennial herb, cyperoid, C3 Mesophyte 600 30–2000 ESW, LES, EC, FS, KN

Scleria bulbifera
Hochst. ex A.Rich.
Perennial herb, cyperoid, geophyte, C3 Mesophyte 600 150–2070 ESW, EC, GA, KN, LP, MP, NW

Scleria dregeanaKunth Perennial herb, cyperoid, C3 Helophyte 800 610–1950 BOT, ESW, LES, EC, GA, KN, LP, MP

Aspects of the current Cyperaceae population of the Cradle of Humankind
Figure 2 

Aspects of the current Cyperaceae population of the Cradle of Humankind. a) Percentages of C3 vs C4 photosynthetic pathways represented. b) Percentages of genera represented amongst the Cradle’s sedges. c) Aspects of the growth forms represented. d) Levels of water dependence represented wherein helophytes require aquatic conditions and mesophytes usually avoid growing in the water-logged soils and can thrive in dryland ecologies. e) The maximum heights to which the different Cyperaceae of the Cradle grow. f) The general elevations at which the different Cyperaceae of the Cradle grow with the textured bars indicating the elevation of the vegetation units.

All the plants, bar two from the Carex genus (i.e., C. rhodesiaca and the non-indigenous C. acutiformis), are listed as having cyperoid growth forms – thus, being true sedges (Table 2). Amongst them, three (10%) are also classified as geophytes (i.e., Cyperus esculentus, Cyperus rotundus and Scleria bulbifera), that is plants with growth forms that include specifically modified stem or root systems for the storage of energy or water in the form of tubers, corms, rhizomes, or bulbs (see Beentjie 2016) (Figure 2b). Cumulatively, at least 15 (52%) of the Cradle Cyperaceae have C4 photosynthetic pathways as opposed to the 12 (41%) with C3 pathways. For two Cyperus species I could not find information about their pathways (i.e., C. austro-africanus and C. uitenhagensis), but, even if they both turn out to have C3 pathways, C4 sedges are still best represented on the Cradle landscape today (Figure 2c).

When it comes to the relationship of the Cradle sedges with water, only two (7%) are emergent hydrophytes that habitually grow in shallow water (i.e., Cyperus sexangularis and Schoenoplectus brachyceras), and Fuirena stricta is the solitary aquatic, sudd hydrophyte that grows rooted in an impenetrable mass of floating vegetable matter. Helophytes – plants typical of marshy or lake-edge environments (sometimes also salty), in which the USOs are generally submerged in soil or mud with the aerial shoots protruding above the surface – comprise 41% of the Cradle’s Cyperaceae, with Fimbristylis dichotoma also able to thrive in drier settings. However, more than half (55%) of the Cradle’s Cyperaceae taxa are mesophytes. These plants are adapted to neither particularly dry nor particularly wet environments needing only moderate amounts of water. Different from hydrophytes and helophytes, they typically avoid soils with standing and/or salty water (Table 2; Figure 2d).

Unlike Cyperus papyrus, an emergent sudd hydrophyte that grows up to 4.5 m tall and at altitudes of 7–1000 m.a.s.l., most of the Cradle’s sedges never grow more than a metre tall, with only three taxa (i.e., Cyperus fastigiatus, C. leptocladus and C. sexangularis) ever reaching 1.5 m or more. Tiny species never growing taller than ~30 cm include Bulbostylis humilis, Cyperus rupestris, C. uitenhagensis and Isolepis cernua (Figure 2e). Most of the sedges growing in the Cradle never outgrow the surrounding grasses, and several of them are grass-like, so that they easily disappear within their surroundings. The veld types associated with the Cradle of Humankind (Figures 1 and 2f; see Mucina and Rutherford, 2011), range in altitude from ~1050 to ~1750 m.a.s.l., and all the sedges currently growing there have altitude ranges that fit these vegetation units with Carex uhligii, Cyperus rotundus and C. sexangularis perhaps limited to the lower-laying areas of the Cradle landscape (Figure 2f). Based on these data, we could probably rule out both Cyperus papyrus and the ‘unknown big sedge’, identified by Henry et al. (2019) as possibly being Cyperus dives, as growing in the Cradle of Humankind. Both these species usually grow at altitudes of ≤1000 m and neither has yet been identified as indigenous to the high-altitude grasslands of the Gauteng and Northwest Provinces of South Africa where the Cradle is located. Also, if the plateau uplift happened at ~4 Ma, it may be that these species were not around since the Plio-Pleistocene transitional period associated with the appearance of the hominins.

Foodplant Sedges of the Cradle of Humankind

From the list above (Table 2), three species have been recorded in the context of baboon feeding, two of which are also foraged and eaten by humans, and three more by humans only. At least six of the Cradle’s current Cyperaceae species can therefore be identified as potential hominin food sources. Bulbostylis burchellii (Ficalho & Hiern) C.B. Clarke (Figure 3) is a small, grass-like perennial sedge with a C4 pathway that is prolific in Gauteng, South Africa, where it grows amongst the grasses on rocky ridges (e.g., Bredenkamp & Theron 1978; Bredenkamp et al. 2006). It is adapted to an environment with little water, making it a hardy, drought-resistant, densely tufted plant, growing from a delicate woody rhizome. Marais (2005) recorded baboons feeding on its roots during the winter in the Blyde River Canyon (Mpumalanga, South Africa). Little else seems to be known about this species in terms of its suitability as a foodplant. Its observation as a baboon food source during the dry winter, however, together with its hardiness and proliferation in the Cradle region may warrant further exploration as a fallback food when other more luscious sources have been depleted.

Bulbostylis burchellii (Ficalho & Hiern) C.B. Clarke
Figure 3 

Bulbostylis burchellii (Ficalho & Hiern) C.B. Clarke. a) Distribution in southern Africa (https://www.gbif.org/species/5292413); b) inflorescence (photo by Matthew Fainman); c) growing in the veld (photo by David Hoare); d) rootstock (photo by Nick Helme). All photographs are licensed for use under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Cyperus congestus Vahl (Figure 4. Previously: Mariscus congestus, commonly known as dense flat-sedge or clustered flat-sedge, and in South Africa as hedgehog sedge) is a perennial, facultative palustrine wetland plant, that grows as a grass-like sedge with a C4 pathway (e.g., Sonnenberg & Botha 1992; Verloove 2014). As an emergent narrow-leaved aquatic plant, its habitats include damp stream banks, moist depressions in grasslands, and the margins of temporary waterbodies throughout much of South Africa (van Ginkel & Cilliers 2020; also see Gordon-Gray et al. 2006). The sweetish, crisp USOs have a slightly astringent juice, and light roasting improves their flavour. They are an important food source of the !Kung hunter-gatherers of Namibia (e.g., Story 1958; Marshall 1976; Fox & Norwood Young 1982), and in the Eastern Cape, South Africa, Bhat et al. (2002) recorded how the leaves are pulled from the ground and the white part of the plant consumed as a wild vegetable found year-round near riverbanks.

Cyperus congestus Vahl
Figure 4 

Cyperus congestus Vahl. a) Distribution in southern Africa (https://www.gbif.org/species/2714656); b) inflorescence (photo by David Hoare); c) growing in the veld (photo by Namhla); d & e) rootstock and USO (photos by David Hoare). All photographs are licensed for use under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Cyperus esculentus L. (Figure 5. A.k.a. yellow nutsedge, earth almond, chufa, tiger nut; in South Africa patrysuintjie) may have been part of the Paranthropus boisei diet in eastern Africa (e.g., Macho 2014). It is a perennial cyperoid herb with a C4 pathway, needing only a moderate amount of water. The USOs are sweet with a nutty flavour and is used as a vegetable in southern Africa and elsewhere (Watt & Breyer-Brandwijk 1962). For example, herd boys, women and children of the high-altitude uKhahlamba-Drakensberg and Lesotho grasslands eat the raw or baked tubers that are available year-round (Vinnicombe 1976; Fox & Norwood Young 1982, and see Mabogo 1990 for an account from the Limpopo Province). Nama-speaking people of Namaqualand and Namibia also eat the lower stem raw or roasted (Archer 1994), whilst in both Namibia and South Africa, the tubers are sometimes pounded and stirred with water into a paste, to which milk and honey is added. Mixed with a grain porridge, it provides a delicious and hearty meal (von Koenen 2001; Roberts & Roberts 2017). Further north in Africa the wild USOs are foraged, cleaned and sold in markets as ‘tiger nuts’, and in west Africa the plant is cultivated for its sweet corms in the context of milk production and making fortifying gruels (Roberts & Roberts 2017). As one of the earliest cultivated crops in ancient Egypt, it was used widely, perhaps because as little as 150–200 g of USO tissue satisfies the human daily requirements for lipid/fat intake (Eteshola & Oraedu 1996; Dominy 2012).

Cyperus esculentus L
Figure 5 

Cyperus esculentus L.: a) Distribution in southern Africa (https://www.gbif.org/species/2716226); b) inflorescence (photo by David Hoare); c) growing in the veld (photo by Dave Richardson); d) culm and stalk (photo by David Hoare); e) rootstock and tubers (photo by Dan Spaulding). All photographs are licensed for use under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Cyperus rotundus L. (Figure 6. A.k.a. purple nutsedge) is a perennial, grass-like sedge with a C4 pathway, preferring dry conditions but will tolerate moist soils. Similar to C. esculentus its tubers somewhat resemble ‘nuts’. The plant is widespread throughout Africa, growing in almost every soil type, humidity, and pH, but not in the shade or soils with a high salt content, and perhaps not in the higher lying mountainous regions. Its robustness earned it the reputation as ‘one of the world’s worst weeds’ (e.g., Holm et al. 1977). The tubers are edible raw or cooked (e.g., Tanaka 1976; Lim 2016). It is one of the sedges most often recorded in the context of baboon USO feeding in eastern Africa (e.g., Swedell et al. 2008; Schreier 2010; Bentley-Condit & Power 2018). Soaking the tuber will overcome its hardness, and the bitterness is reduced by drying it for a few days before consumption (Lim 2016). The dried tubers can be ground into a powder and used as a cereal (Moerman 1998), and the tiny seeds of this sedge are also edible (Kunkel 1984). The USOs have been recorded in southern Africa as food foraged by both the Topnaar of Namibia and the Kalahari !Kung hunter-gatherers (Van damme et al. 1922; Lee 1979). In western Africa the slightly fragrant tubers are gathered and chewed by herdsmen and boys (Irvine 1952). There are several archaeological reports for C. rotundus as a foodplant. For example, tuber remains from Wadi Kubbaniya, Egypt, at ~18 ka, and microfossils from human dental calculus from Al Khiday, Central Sudan, at ~7 ka (e.g., Buckley et al. 2014; Dwyer 2016).

Cyperus rotundus L
Figure 6 

Cyperus rotundus L.: a) Distribution in southern Africa (https://www.gbif.org/species/2714818); b) inflorescence (photo by Yael Orgad); c) growing in the veld (photo by David Hoare); d) inflorescence closeup; e) rootstock (photos by Bry Celee). All photographs are licensed for use under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Cyperus sexangularis Nees (Figure 7) is the only taxon amongst the Cradle sedge foodplants that has a C3 photosynthetic pathway and is also the tallest – growing up to 1500 mm. It is a robust, tufted grass-like cyperoid herb belonging to the emergent narrow-leaved aquatic plants of southern Africa associated with palustrine and riverine wetlands where it grows along the edges of pans, rivers and streams, often rooted in wet/watery substrates, but occasionally also found in drier soils (van Ginkel & Cilliers 2020). San hunter-gatherer children would uproot and eat the young shoots, while still enfolded in their basal sheaths, drawing out the soft pith between their teeth (Smith 1966).

Cyperus sexangularis Nees
Figure 7 

Cyperus sexangularis Nees: a) Distribution in southern Africa (https://www.gbif.org/species/2716106); b) inflorescence (photo by Kate Braun); c) growing in the veld (photo by Vuyiswa Sithatu); d) young shoots (photo by David Hoare); e) stem cross-section (photo by Wynand Uys); f) inflorescence closeup (photo by David Hoare). All photographs are licensed for use under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Kyllinga alba Nees (Figure 8) is a small robust, densely tufted, grass-like cyperoid herb with a C4 pathway needing only a moderate amount of water. The USO is eaten by children in Kenya (Ichikawa 1987; Mutie et al. 2020), and baboons from the Laikipia Plateau, Kenya, also eat the flower/seed heads (Barton et al. 1993). In southern Africa, the roots are traditionally used as stoppers in ostrich eggshell bottles, possibly because of antibacterial properties that keep the water fresh, and the pleasant fresh taste the roots give to the water (van Wyk & Gericke 2000).

Kyllinga alba Nees
Figure 8 

Kyllinga alba Nees: a) Distribution in southern Africa (https://www.gbif.org/species/2718781); b) growing in the veld; d) inflorescence; e) rootstock. All photographs by Christfried Naumann from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_domain.

Cyperus esculentus (Patrysuintjies) in terms of Energy, Protein and Fat

Of the six foodplants above, the USOs of Cyperus esculentus, elsewhere also known as ‘tiger nuts’, stand out as a contemporary ‘superfood’ (e.g., Vega-Morales et al. 2019). The plant may well have been available during the Plio-Pleistocene in sub-Saharan Africa considering that its bio-geographical history indicates a dispersal from Africa with the most recent common ancestor between C. esculentus taxa dating to 5.1 Ma (de Castro et al. 2015). In South Africa and Namibia one of the Afrikaans names for this plant is patrysuintjie. Uintjie (pronounced /ˈeɪŋki/ or /ˈœɪŋki/) is a general term used by the local populations (including the Khoe-San) for a number of Cyperaceae and Iridaceae species known for their edible USOs. Thunberg (1794–5) recorded the vernacular as deriving from the Dutch word for onion (ajuin), used in the 1600s by Van der Stel for corms (in this instance Moraea edulis [now M. aristata]) eaten by the indigenous Khoe people living at the Cape of Good Hope when the Europeans first arrived there (Smith 1966). Most of the uintjie species subsequently received descriptive names based on a special characteristic. In the case of C. esculentus, patrys = partridge, refers to the fact that guineafowl and other indigenous partridge species enthusiastically scratch for the tubers whenever they can find them (e.g., Roberts & Roberts 2017). The keen ethological eye of hunter-gatherer women and children would undoubtedly find patches of C. esculentus on their foraging forays by observing bird behaviour – much in the same way they find honey (e.g., Guy 1972; Kahn & Weiss 2017). For the southern African context, patrysuintjie is therefore a more accurate and appropriate vernacular than ‘tiger nut’, seeing that there were/are no wild tigers in sub-Saharan Africa, the USOs have nothing to do with nuts botanically, and it acknowledges their status as indigenous, pre-colonial Khoe-San food source.

Today, C. esculentus is an important crop of the Spanish Mediterranean where the tubers are used to produce a refreshing milk-like beverage called horchata de chufa (Mosquera et al., 1996). Spain and other European countries also import tons of cultivated C. esculentus tubers from African countries such as Nigeria, Niger, Mali, Senegal, Ghana, the Ivory Coast and Togo. In these countries they are mostly used as an uncooked vegetable or side dish (e.g., Omode et al. 1995), but in Nigeria similar to Spain, it is used to make kunnu, a non-alcoholic beverage sometimes also prepared from cereals such as millet and sorghum. Here, Belewu and Abodunrin (2008) showed that whilst the energy content of kunnu prepared from C. esculentus tubers, millet and sorghum were similar, the sedge-corm drink had the highest percentages of fat and protein, and that it was the most palatable.

The plant is also cultivated in American countries such as Chile, Brazil and the USA in Louisiana, Missouri, New Mexico and Florida where it is mainly used to supplement animal feed (Sánchez-Zapata et al. 2012). Although C. esculentus is still considered a weed in many countries (e.g., De Vries 1991; Adejuyitan 2011; Ukwuru et al. 2011; Lauwers et al. 2020), it is now widely recognised as a ‘health food’. For example, the tubers are considered to help prevent heart disease, diabetes and thrombosis, activate blood circulation, and assist in the treatment of gastrointestinal diseases and/or reducing the risk of colon cancer (Borges et al. 2008; Adejuyitan et al. 2009; Chukwuma et al. 2010; Sánchez-Zapata et al. 2012; Kiyashko et al. 2020). Below, I explore the nutritional values of C. esculentus tubers sourced from various markets in Africa mostly provided by subsistence farming in terms of energy, protein, and fat/lipids to assess their potential as C4-USO food source within the dietary ecology of the Cradle of Humankind (also see Supplementary file 1).

As hominin brain sizes increased, they also progressively required foods with a high energy, protein and fat/lipid yield (e.g., Aiello & Wheeler 1995; Milton 1999; Ben-Dor et al. 2011). The current daily requirement for energy in adult humans is ~8400 kj, for protein 46–56 g, and for fat 44–77 g (e.g., National Health Services, UK). In terms of energy (kj/100 g), all the C. esculentus samples are in the top 50% of a sample of 71 different USO foods (Figure 9a). They group favourably with peanuts (Arachis hypogaea) as the top energy-USO crop (e.g., Eshun et al. 2013; Mustapha et al. 2015), Yams (Dioscorea spp.) (e.g., Lewu et al. 2010; Adepoju et al. 2018; Ezeabara & Anona 2018; Erena & Alemu 2019), Vigna frutescens a tuber eaten by Hadza foragers in Tanzania (e.g., Schoeninger et al. 2001), African potatoes (Hypoxis spp.) (e.g., Wadley 1978; Otunola & Afolayan 2019), and C. rotundus or purple nutsedge (e.g., Wehmeyer 1986; Ibrahim et al. 2013; Eltilib et al. 2016; Ikon et al. 2020). The five African C. papyrus samples, on the other hand, are all in the bottom 50% together with potatoes (Solanum tuberosum) (e.g., Wehmeyer 1986; Jimenez et al. 2015), Cladium mariscus (e.g., Sievers 2015), and the Cradle-sedge USOs tested by Henry et al. (2019).

Energy, protein and fat/lipid values of Cyperus esculentus (golden bars) compared to Cyperus papyrus (grey bars) and other USO foods from Africa and potatoes from Argentina (green bars)
Figure 9 

Energy, protein and fat/lipid values of Cyperus esculentus (golden bars) compared to Cyperus papyrus (grey bars) and other USO foods from Africa and potatoes from Argentina (green bars). For the energy values I use kilojoules, converting values that were originally published in Kilocalories or carbohydrates into the approximate kilojoules using the relevant Google calculator. Key to abbreviations: R = raw, D = dried. See Supplementary file 1 for raw data.

Protein values for both C. esculentus and C. Papyrus are variable, with that of the 15 C. esculentus samples ranging between 3.3 and 9.7 g/100 g (mean = 5.2, SD = 1.9, median = 5), which is generally higher compared to that of five available C. papyrus samples ranging from 0.5–7 g/100 g (mean = 3.7, SD = 2.9, median = 4.1) (Figure 9b). C. esculentus USOs (together with peanuts) stand out, however, in terms of fat/lipid content amongst all the other samples, with C. rotundus the only another Cradle sedge with two samples amongst the top 40% out of the 54 samples in total (Figure 9c). By contrast, all the C. papyrus samples fall within the bottom 40% in terms of their fat/lipid nutritional values. Collectively, these data demonstrate that C. esculentus or patrysuintjies are consistently more nutritious – and in terms of both energy and fat/lipid content exponentially so – compared to C. papyrus and domesticated potatoes that up to now served as standard for ‘high nutrient quality’ amongst the potential hominin sedge-USO foods (e.g., Wrangham et al. 2009 following Van der Merwe et al. 2008).

In terms of bioavailability (the fraction of an ingested nutrient that reaches systemic circulation), Codina-Torella et al. (2015) showed that C. esculentus tubers have low tannin and phytate levels. Tannins are known to interfere with the bioavailability of some nutrients in the intestinal track, decreasing their absorption, and low levels may indicate good digestibility, especially for proteins (e.g., Glew et al. 2006; Okoye & Ene 2018). Phytates can form insoluble complexes with minerals such as calcium, iron, potassium, magnesium, zinc and manganese, causing reduction in bioavailability and absorption of such minerals in the body. Its relative low levels in C. esculentus tubers limit such reduction so that these minerals can be absorbed (Codina-Torella et al. 2015). C. esculentus oil contains high proportions of oleic acid, which is considered high-quality oil in terms of digestibility or bioavailability (Guo et al. 2021). Guo et al. (2021) also found that the content of unsaturated fatty acids is considerably higher than saturated fatty acids so that C. esculentus oil is an edible oil with an excellent fatty acid composition.

C. esculentus tubers produce 47.9% of its weight as digestible carbohydrates (Addy & Eteshola 1984), and a low-digestible viscous starch (Li et al. 2017). According to Li et al. (2017) such starches are gaining interest because they are related to the improved metabolism of lipids and cholesterol, and pre-biotic effects on the microbiome of the colon where they ferment and become more digestible. They also show benefits regarding low glycaemic response, causing satiety and improved physical performance and glucose tolerance, as well as reduced blood lipid level and insulin resistance (Li et al. 2017; also see Grabitske & Slavin 2008). The total digestible nutrients in four C. esculentus tuber verities from Turkey ranged from 71.59% to 73.78% (Ayaşan et al. 2020). Bioavailability levels will vary contextually, but the existing information generally shows good systemic availability for the nutrients contained in C. esculentus tubers. Relatively little is known about the bio-accessibility (the amount of an ingested nutrient that is available for absorption in the gut after digestion) of C. esculentus tubers, and further in vivo studies are needed to evaluate this aspect (e.g., Moral-Anter et al. 2021).

In terms of biomass, the tuber dispersal of C. esculentus is profuse. In a single year’s growth, one ‘mother tuber’ can produce more than 1900 shoots and up to ~6900 tubers in an area of 3.2 m2 (Tumbleson et al. 1961; Jordan-Molero & Stoller 1978; Lauwers et al. 2020). Depending on circumstance, the tubers may lie dormant for several years at a depth of up to 20 cm (Stoller et al. 1973; Lauwers et al. 2020), so that even during times of extreme drought or after destructive veldfires, when the aerial parts of the plants are dry or ruined, the corms are protected and remain a reliable food source. The fact that the nutritious USOs grow from thin roots, some distance from the culm (Figure 10a), may be one of the reasons why this sedge foodplant has not yet been collected or reported on from the Cradle of Humankind or other areas in southern Africa as possible hominin dietary source. When collectors are unfamiliar with the ethno-historical use of foodplants in the region and their growth habits, it is easy to miss patrysuintjies because they often break off from the brittle roots when pulled from the soil or when the collecting strategy is too shallow – resulting in a culm with roots but no tubers (Figure 10b). Sometimes the USOs are only pea-sized, making them even more difficult to find and collect for study (Figure 10c).

Cyperus esculentus USOs
Figure 10 

Cyperus esculentus USOs: a) Corms growing from thin, brittle roots several centimetres below the culm (photo by Dan Spaulding). b) Culm and rootstock collected without corms (photo by David Hoare). c) Pea-sized corms that can be easily missed during collection (photo by J.M. Neiva). All photographs are licensed for use under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/.

Concluding Discussion

At the beginning of this contribution, I identified four questions arising from previous literature that may benefit from an inventory of the sedge species currently growing in the Cradle of Humankind, and from an understanding of the human use of indigenous foodplants in the region. The first question pertains to the sedge population and its proportion of plants with C4 photosynthetic pathways. Here I demonstrated that the Cradle currently has a recorded sedge population of 29 species, which is considerably more, and more diverse, than the six sedge groups recently collected and studied by Henry et al. (2019). At least half of them have C4 photosynthetic pathways. These results from the high-altitude Grassland-Savanna ecotone of the Cradle landscape itself contrasts notably with the 28% of C4 sedges reported by Sponheimer et al. (2005) for the comparative low-altitude Savanna Biome of the Kruger National Park, South Africa. Using the inventory provided here, future studies can now focus on the actual sedge population growing in the Cradle of Humankind for the reconstruction of the local hominin dietary ecology, instead of relying on proxies from locations with completely different vegetation units – such as the Kruger National Park (see Mucina & Rutherford, 2011 for differences in vegetation units between the Cradle of Humankind and the Kruger National Park) – or small-scale plot sampling within the Cradle that cannot accurately or fully assess the vegetation richness of the landscape. Importantly, the notion that the Sterkfontein Valley may have contained a preponderance of C3 sedges (much more so than their C4 counterparts) can be rejected as a working hypothesis for the dietary ecology of the Cradle’s hominins.

The second question asked whether all the sedges growing in the Cradle necessarily require aquatic habitats or extensive wetlands to thrive. In this context, I established that more than half of the Cradle’s Cyperaceae taxa are mesophytes that thrive without needing permanent, extensive wetland ecologies. Instead, most species are mesophytes, and therefore well adapted to the Cradle’s ecology with its seasonal fluctuation in precipitation and for thriving in drier substrates. The current Cradle sedge data therefore reveal that a shallow-water ecology is not a requirement for all African sedge regimes – consequently drawing into question the inference that access to shallow-water aquatic habitats was ‘a necessary condition’ for all hominin adaptation to the Savanna and/or Grassland Biomes of sub-Saharan Africa as suggested by Wrangham et al. (2009).

Thirdly, I asked which of the sedges growing in the Cradle are known human and/or primate foodplants, and whether these have C3 or C4 pathways. I identified six of the Cradle’s Cyperaceae species as known baboon and/or human foodplants used throughout sub-Saharan Africa. Five of them have C4 pathways. This outcome contradicts Sponheimer’s (2013) suggestion that, especially in terms of the foodplants available to hominins in the Sterkfontein Valley, the ‘vast majority’ was C3 sedges. What is more, only two of the USO-sedge foodplants are ‘wetland’ plants, the rest being well-adapted to the drier, summer-rain conditions of the Cradle landscape. Thus, by focussing on the sedges actually growing in the Cradle, and through insight provided by the ethno-historical records of the use of foodplants in southern Africa, it becomes clear that local non-aquatic sedges may have directly contributed to the C4 signatures observed in the diets of the South African hominins – even if other components added to such a signature (e.g., Peters & Vogel 2005).

Lastly, I wanted to explore whether there is a Cradle C4-sedge foodplant that stands out in terms of nutritional value in the way that it was claimed for C. papyrus in eastern Africa by van der Merwe et al. (2008) and Wrangham et al. (2009). By comparing the nutritional values in terms of energy, protein and fat/lipids, I could highlight the local patrysuintjies or the USOs of Cyperus esculentus as a C4-sedge foodplant that exceeds the nutrition potentially provided by C. papyrus to early hominins. In fact, only a few hands full of these sweet-tasting raw corms easily fulfils the current daily requirement for energy, protein and fat/lipids in adult humans – something that C. papyrus cannot do.

Unlike C. papyrus, patrysuintjies do not grow in wetland or aquatic ecologies, instead they thrive amongst the grasses on drier ground, well-adapted to withstand the cyclic drought and fire regimes of the high-altitude Cradle ecotone landscape.

Whilst C. esculentus is a likely candidate for a staple food in the Cradle, it is equally important not to ignore the greater nutritional landscape (e.g., Henry et al. 2019). The full inventory (n = 223) of the Cradle’s foodplant taxa (Lombard & van Aardt 2022), highlights the most species-rich foodplant families such as the Poaceae, Apocynaceae, and Fabaceae. It shows that the Cradle’s geophytic foodplants are dominated by the Apocynaceae, which is in contrast with the Cape Fynbos region where the high geophyte frequency is largely ascribed to the Iridaceae (Welcome & Van Wyk, 2019). The Cradle’s foodplant population also contains a good proportion of non-geophytic plants (i.e., plants without specifically modified root systems such as tubers, corms, rhizomes, or bulbs) with growth forms that range from perennial trees to annual herbs whose USOs or roots are known to be eaten (for species and discussion see Lombard & van Aardt 2022). Most of these plants require further investigation in terms of their potential nutritional potential – as well as their (including C. esculentus tubers) mechanical properties to assess how they align with Cradle-hominin tooth microwear (e.g., Scott et al. 2005; Grine et al. 2012; Ungar et al. 2008; Casteren et al. 2020).

However, with their evolutionary time depth of more than 5 Ma, and their extraordinary ability to generate a prolific and nutritious geophytic biomass year-round, C. esculentus tubers may well have provided a dependable superfood to the Cradle’s hominins, as they still do to many Africans today, as well as to the world’s rapidly growing health-food industry. I therefore suggest that future studies may benefit from exploring the phytolith characterisation of C. esculentus, the potentially tool-assisted foraging strategies that would have enabled hominins to access the corms, as well as testing the outcomes presented here with further dental microwear and isotopic research. My own exploration will continue into fine-grained macro- and micro-nutrient analyses of C. esculentus and the potential adaptive benefits access to such plants and their nutrients may have provided the hominins who roamed the Cradle of Humankind landscape.

Additional File

The additional file for this article can be found as follows:

Supplementary File 1

Data for USO nutrition. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/oq.110.s1

Acknowledgements

I thank two anonymous reviewers for their time and suggestions on how to improve this manuscript. Andri van Aardt (University of the Free State) provided valuable botanical advice, and Stephanie Baker and Matt Caruana (University of Johannesburg) were available for discussing Cradle research in general. Opinions and mistakes remain my own.

Competing Interests

The author has no competing interests to declare.

References

  1. Addy, EO and Eteshola, E. 1984. Nutritive value of a mixture of tigernut tubers (Cyperus esculentus L.) and baobab seeds (Adansonia digitata L.). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 35(4): 437–440. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2740350412 

  2. Adejuyitan, JA, Otunola, ET, Akande, EA, Bolarinwa, IF and Oladokun, FM. 2009. Some physicochemical properties of flour obtained from fermentation of tigernut (Cyperus esculentus) sourced from a market in Ogbomoso, Nigeria. African Journal of Food Science, 3(2): 51–55. 

  3. Adepoju, OT, Boyejo, O and Adeniji, PO. 2018. Effects of processing methods on nutrient and antinutrient composition of yellow yam (Dioscorea cayenensis) products. Food Chemistry, 238: 160–165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.10.071 

  4. Aiello, LC and Wheeler, P. 1995. The expensive-tissue hypothesis: The brain and the digestive system in human and primate evolution. Current Anthropology, 36(2): 199–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/204350 

  5. Archer, FM. 1994. Ethnobotany of Namaqualand: The Richtersveld. Unpublished thesis (MA), University of Cape Town. 

  6. Ayaşan, T, Sucu, EKİN, Ülger, I, Hızlı, H, Çubukcu, P and Özcan, BD. 2020. Determination of in vitro rumen digestibility and potential feed value of tiger nut varieties. South African Journal of Animal Science, 50(5): 738–744. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4314/sajas.v50i5.12 

  7. Bailey, GN, Reynolds, SC and King, GC. 2011. Landscapes of human evolution: Models and methods of tectonic geomorphology and the reconstruction of hominin landscapes. Journal of human Evolution, 60(3): 257–280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.01.004 

  8. Bamford, M. 1999. Pliocene fossil woods from an early hominid cave deposit, Sterkfontein, South Africa. South African Journal of Science, 95(5): 231–237. 

  9. Barton, RA, Whiten, A, Byrne, RW and English, M. 1993. Chemical composition of baboon plant foods: Implications for the interpretation of intra-and interspecific differences in diet. Folia Primatologica, 61(1): 1–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000156722 

  10. Bentley-Condit, VK and Power, ML. 2018. The nutritional content of Tana River yellow baboon (Papio cynocephalus) foods in a partially forested habitat. Plos one, 13(11): e0207186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207186 

  11. Besnard, G, Muasya, AM, Russier, F, Roalson, EH, Salamin, N and Christin, PA. 2009. Phylogenomics of C4 photosynthesis in sedges (Cyperaceae): Multiple appearances and genetic convergence. Molecular Biology and Evolution, 26(8): 1909–1919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msp103 

  12. Belewu, MA and Abodunrin, OA. 2008. Preparation of Kunnu from unexploited rich food source: Tiger nut (Cyperus esculentus). Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 7(1): 109–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2008.109.111 

  13. Ben-Dor, M, Gopher, A, Hershkovitz, I and Barkai, R. 2011. Man the fat hunter: The demise of Homo erectus and the emergence of a new hominin lineage in the Middle Pleistocene (ca. 400 kyr) Levant. PLoS One, 6(12): e28689. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0028689 

  14. Bhat, RB, Rubuluza, T and Jäger, AK. 2002. The bio-diversity of traditional vegetables of the Transkei region in the Eastern Cape of South Africa. South African Journal of Botany, 68(1): 94–99. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-6299(16)30463-X 

  15. Borges, O, Gonçalves, B, de Carvalho, JLS, Correia, P and Silva, AP. 2008. Nutritional quality of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) cultivars from Portugal. Food Chemistry, 106(3): 976–984. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.07.011 

  16. Botha, MS, Cowling, RM, Esler, KJ, De Vynck, J and Potts, AJ. 2019. Have humans living within the Greater Cape Floristic Region used the same plant species through time? South African Journal of Botany, 122: 11–20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2019.01.013 

  17. Bredenkamp, GJ, Brown, LR and Pfab, MF. 2006. Conservation value of the Egoli Granite Grassland, an endemic grassland in Gauteng, South Africa. Koedoe, 49(2): 59–66. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v49i2.112 

  18. Bredenkamp, GJ and Theron, GK. 1978. A synecological account of the Suikerbosrand Nature Reserve. I: The phytosociology of the Witwatersrand geological system. Bothalia, 12(3): 513–529. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/abc.v12i3.1810 

  19. Buckley, S, Usai, D, Jakob, T, Radini, A and Hardy, K. 2014. Dental calculus reveals unique insights into food items, cooking and plant processing in prehistoric central Sudan. PLoS One, 9(7): e100808. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100808 

  20. Caley, T, Extier, T, Collins, JA, Schefuß, E, Dupont, L, Malaizé, B, Rossignol, L, Souron, A, McClymont, EL, Jimenez-Espejo, FJ and García-Comas, C. 2018. A two-million-year-long hydroclimatic context for hominin evolution in southeastern Africa. Nature, 560(7716): 76–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0309-6 

  21. Carruthers, V. 2014. The Magaliesberg: Biosphere Edition. Pretoria: Protea Book House. 

  22. Cerling, TE, Chritz, KL, Jablonski, NG, Leakey, MG and Manthi, FK. 2013. Diet of Theropithecus from 4 to 1 Ma in Kenya. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(26): 10507–10512. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222571110 

  23. Chukwuma, ER, Obioma, N and Christopher, OI. 2010. The phytochemical composition and some biochemical effects of Nigerian tigernut (Cyperus esculentus L.) tuber. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 9(7): 709–715. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2010.709.715 

  24. Codina-Torrella, I, Guamis, B and Trujillo, AJ. 2015. Characterization and comparison of tiger nuts (Cyperus esculentus L.) from different geographical origin: Physico-chemical characteristics and protein fractionation. Industrial Crops and Products, 65: 406–414. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.11.007 

  25. Codron, D, Lee-Thorp, JA, Sponheimer, M, De Ruiter, D and Codron, J. 2008. What insights can baboon feeding ecology provide for early hominin niche differentiation? International Journal of Primatology, 29(3): 757–772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-008-9261-x 

  26. Codron, DM. 2003. Dietary ecology of Chacma baboons (Papio Ursinus (Kerr, 1972)) and Pleistocene Cercopithecoidea in Savanna environments of South Africa. Unpublished thesis (MSc), University of Cape Town. 

  27. De Castro, O, Gargiulo, R, Del Guacchio, E, Caputo, P and De Luca, P. 2015. A molecular survey concerning the origin of Cyperus esculentus (Cyperaceae, Poales): Two sides of the same coin (weed vs. crop). Annals of Botany, 115(5): 733–745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcv001 

  28. De Vries, FT. 1991. Chufa (Cyperus esculentus, Cyperaceae): A weedy cultivar or a cultivated weed? Economic Botany, 45(1): 27–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02860047 

  29. Dirks, PH and Berger, LR. 2013. Hominin-bearing caves and landscape dynamics in the Cradle of Humankind, South Africa. Journal of African Earth Sciences, 78: 109–131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2012.09.012 

  30. Dominy, NJ. 2012. Hominins living on the sedge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(50): 20171–20172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218081110 

  31. Dunbar, RI. 1976. Australopithecine diet based on a baboon analogy. Journal of Human Evolution, 5(2): 161–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2484(76)90019-1 

  32. Dwyer, J. 2016. Cyperus rotundus L.: An ancient food staple but now designated the world’s worst weed. Proceedings of Twentieth Australasian Weeds Conference, 251–254. Perth, Western Australia: Weeds Society of Western Australia. 

  33. Eloff, G. 2010. The phytosiology of the natural vegetation occuring in the Cradle of Humankind World Heritage Site Gauteng, South Africa. Unpublished thesis (PhD), University of South Africa. 

  34. Eltilib, HH, Elgasim, EA and Ahmed, IAM. 2016. Effect of incorporation of Cyperus rotundus L. rhizome powder on quality attributes of minced beef meat. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 53(9): 3446–3454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-016-2317-6 

  35. Elton, S and Dunn, J. 2020. Baboon biogeography, divergence, and evolution: Morphological and paleoecological perspectives. Journal of Human Evolution, 145: 102799. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2020.102799 

  36. Eshun, G, Amankwah, EA and Barimah, J. 2013. Nutrients content and lipid characterization of seed pastes of four selected peanut (Arachis hypogaea) varieties from Ghana. African Journal of Food Science, 7(10): 375–381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5897/AJFS12.136 

  37. Eteshola, E and Oraedu, ACI. 1996. Fatty acid compositions of tigernut tubers (Cyperus esculentus L.), baobab seeds (Adansonia digitata L.), and their mixture. Journal of the American Oil Chemists’ Society, 73(2): 255–257. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02523905 

  38. Ezeabara, CA and Anona, RO. 2018. Comparative analyses of phytochemical and nutritional compositions of four species of Dioscorea. Acta Scientific Nutritional Health, 2: 90–94. 

  39. Fox, FW and Norwood Young, ME. 1982. Food from the veld: Edible wild plants of Southern Africa. Johannesburg: Delta Books. 

  40. Glew, RH, Glew, RS, Chuang, LT, Huang, YS, Millson, M, Constans, D and Vanderjagt, DJ. 2006. Amino acid, mineral and fatty acid content of pumpkin seeds (Cucurbita spp) and Cyperus esculentus nuts in the Republic of Niger. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 61(2): 49–54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11130-006-0010-z 

  41. Gordon-Gray, KD, Ward, CJ and Edwards, TJ. 2006. Studies in Cyperaceae in southern Africa 38: The identities of Cyperus natalensis, Cyperus crassipes and Cyperus brevis. South African Journal of Botany, 72(1): 133–138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2005.06.002 

  42. Guo, T, Wan, C, Huang, F and Wei, C. 2021. Evaluation of quality properties and antioxidant activities of tiger nut (Cyperus esculentus L.) oil produced by mechanical expression or/with critical fluid extraction. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 141: 110915. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2021.110915 

  43. Guy, RD. 1972. The honey hunters of southern Africa. Bee World, 53(4): 159–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0005772X.1972.11097431 

  44. Henry, AG, Hutschenreuther, A, Paine, OC, Leichleiter, J, Codron, D, Codron, J, Loudon, J, Adolph, S and Sponheimer, M. 2019. Influences on plant nutritional variation and their potential effects on hominin diet selection. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 261: 18–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2018.11.001 

  45. Herries, AI, Hopley, PJ, Adams, JW, Curnoe, D and Maslin, MA. 2010. Letter to the editor: Geochronology and palaeoenvironments of Southern African hominin‐bearing localities—A reply to Wrangham et al., 2009. “Shallow‐water habitats as sources of fallback foods for hominins”. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 143(4): 640–646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21389 

  46. Grabitske, HA and Slavin, JL. 2008. Low-digestible carbohydrates in practice. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 108(10): 1677–1681. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jada.2008.07.010 

  47. Grine, FE, Sponheimer, M, Ungar, PS, Lee‐Thorp, J and Teaford, MF. 2012. Dental microwear and stable isotopes inform the paleoecology of extinct hominins. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 148(2): 285–317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22086 

  48. Holm, LG, Plucknett, DL, Pancho, JV and Herberger, JP. 1977. The World’s Worst Weeds: Distribution and Biology. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii. 

  49. Hopley, PJ, Weedon, GP, Marshall, JD, Herries, AI, Latham, AG and Kuykendall, KL. 2007. High-and low-latitude orbital forcing of early hominin habitats in South Africa. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 256(3–4): 419–432. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2007.01.031 

  50. Ibrahim, S and Abdullahi, UA. 2013. Proximate macromolecular (crude protein & lipid) comparative analysis between Cyperus Rotundus and Cyperus Tuberosus of North-Western Nigeria. International Journal of Science and Research, 4(9): 1635–1637. 

  51. Ichikawa, M. 1987. A preliminary report on the ethnobotany of the Suiei Dorobo in Northern Kenya. African Study Monographs. Supplementary Issue, 7: 1–52. 

  52. Ikon, GM, Etang, UE, Udoiko, EM and Ohagim, IP. 2020. Evaluation of phytochemical contents, proximate nutritional composition and antimicrobial activity of the leaves and rhizome extracts of Cyperus rotundus Linn. in Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. South Asian Journal of Research in Microbiology, 7: 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9734/sajrm/2020/v7i130159 

  53. Irvine, FR. 1952. Supplementary and emergency food plants of West Africa. Economic Botany, 6(1): 23–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02859192 

  54. Jimenez, ME, Rossi, AM and Sammán, NC. 2015. Changes during cooking processes in 6 varieties of Andean Potatoes (Solanum tuberosum ssp. Andinum). American Journal of Plant Sciences, 6(05): 725. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2015.65078 

  55. Jordan-Molero, JE and Stoller, EW. 1978. Seasonal development of yellow and purple nutsedges (Cyperus esculentus and C. rotundus) in Illinois. Weed Science, 26(6): 614–618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043174500064663 

  56. Kahn, PH, Jr. and Weiss, T. 2017. The importance of children interacting with big nature. Children, Youth and Environments, 27(2): 7–24. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7721/chilyoutenvi.27.2.0007 

  57. Kiyashko, NV, Berseneva, SA, Belova, GA and Belov, AN. 2020. Cyperus esculentus L. as a biotechnological raw material and substitute for peanuts in the production of confectionery products. E3S Web of Conferences, 224: 04043. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202022404043 

  58. Kunkel, G. 1984. Plants for Human Consumption. Oberreifenberg: Koeltz Scientific Books. 

  59. Larridon, I, Bauters, K, Reynders, M, Huygh, W, Muasya, AM, Simpson, DA and Goetghebeur, P. 2013. Towards a new classification of the giant paraphyletic genus Cyperus (Cyperaceae): Phylogenetic relationships and generic delimitation in C4 Cyperus. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, 172(1): 106–126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/boj.12020 

  60. Larridon, I, Huygh, W, Reynders, M, Muasya, AM, Govaerts, R, Simpson, DA and Goetghebeur, P. 2011. Nomenclature and typification of names of genera and subdivisions of genera in Cypereae (Cyperaceae): 2. Names of subdivisions of Cyperus. Taxon, 60(3): 868–884. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.603021 

  61. Lauwers, M, De Cauwer, B, Nuyttens, D, Cool, SR and Pieters, JG. 2020. Hyperspectral classification of Cyperus esculentus clones and morphologically similar weeds. Sensors, 20(9): 2504. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s20092504 

  62. Lee, RB. 1979. The! Kung San: Men, women and work in a foraging society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 

  63. Lee-Thorp, J, Likius, A, Mackaye, HT, Vignaud, P, Sponheimer, M and Brunet, M. 2012. Isotopic evidence for an early shift to C4 resources by Pliocene hominins in Chad. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(50): 20369–20372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1204209109 

  64. Lee-Thorp, JA, Sponheimer, M and Luyt, J. 2007. Tracking changing environments using stable carbon isotopes in fossil tooth enamel: An example from the South African hominin sites. Journal of Human Evolution, 53(5): 595–601. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2006.11.020 

  65. Levin, NE, Haile-Selassie, Y, Frost, SR and Saylor, BZ. 2015. Dietary change among hominins and cercopithecids in Ethiopia during the early Pliocene. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(40): 12304–12309. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1424982112 

  66. Lewu, MN, Adebola, PO and Afolayan, AJ. 2010. Comparative assessment of the nutritional value of commercially available cocoyam and potato tubers in South Africa. Journal of Food Quality, 33(4): 461–476. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4557.2010.00325.x 

  67. Li, X, Fu, J, Wang, Y, Ma, F and Li, D. 2017. Preparation of low digestible and viscoelastic tigernut (Cyperus esculentus) starch by Bacillus acidopullulyticus pullulanase. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 102: 651–657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.04.068 

  68. Lim, TK. 2016. Edible medicinal and non-medicinal plants. Modified Stems, Roots, Bulbs, 10: 285–292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8661-7_43 

  69. Lombard, M and van Aardt, AC. 2022. Taking stock of foodplants growing in the Cradle of Humankind Fossil Hominin Site, South Africa. African Archaeological Review early online, 1–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10437-021-09470-6 

  70. Luyt, CJ and Lee-Thorp, JA. 2003. Carbon isotope ratios of Sterkfontein fossils indicate a marked shift to open environments c. 1.7 Myr ago. South African Journal of Science, 99(5): 271–273. 

  71. Macho, GA. 2014. Baboon feeding ecology informs the dietary niche of Paranthropus boisei. PLoS One, 9(1): e84942. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0084942 

  72. Makhubela, TV, Kramers, JD, Scherler, D, Wittmann, H, Dirks, PHGM and Winkler, SR. 2019. Effects of long soil surface residence times on apparent cosmogenic nuclide denudation rates and burial ages in the Cradle of Humankind, South Africa. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 44(15): 2968–2981. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4723 

  73. Marais, AJ. 2005. Resource utilisation of the chacma baboon in different vegetation types in north-eastern mountain sour veld, Blyde Canyon Nature Reserve. Unpublished thesis (PhD): University of South Africa. 

  74. Mabogo, DEN. 1990. The ethnobotany of the Vhavenda. Unpublished thesis (MSc): University of Pretoria. 

  75. Marshall, L. 1976. The! Kung of Nyae Nyae. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674180574 

  76. Milton, K. 1999. A hypothesis to explain the role of meat-eating in human evolution. Evolutionary Anthropology Issues News and Reviews, 8(1): 11–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1520-6505(1999)8:1<11::AID-EVAN6>3.0.CO;2-M 

  77. Moerman, DE. 1998. Native American Ethnobotany (Vol. 879). Portland, OR: Timber press. 

  78. Mogg, A. 1975. Important Plants of Sterkfontein: An Illustrated Guide. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand Press. 

  79. Moral-Anter, D, Campo-Sabariz, J, Ferrer, R and Martín-Venegas, R. 2021. Cyperus esculentus L. tubers (tiger nuts) protect epithelial barrier function in Caco-2 cells infected by Salmonella enteritidis and promote Lactobacillus plantarum growth. Nutrients, 13(1): 71. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13010071 

  80. Mosquera, LA, Sims, CA, Bates, RP and O’Keefe, SF. 1996. Flavor and stability of “horchata de chufas”. Journal of Food Science, 61(4): 856–861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.1996.tb12219.x 

  81. Mucina, L and Rutherford, MC. 2011. The Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland. Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute. 

  82. Murungi, ML and Bamford, MK. 2020. Revised taxonomic interpretations of Cyperaceae phytoliths for (paleo) botanical studies with some notes on terminology. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 275: 104189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revpalbo.2020.104189 

  83. Mustapha, S, Mohammed, UM, Adeosun, NO, Mathew, TJ, Muhammed, SS and Ibn-Aliyu, A. 2015. Nutritional and functional characterization of undecorticated groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) seeds from Bosso Market, Minna, Nigeria. American Journal of Food Science and Technology, 3(5): 126–131. 

  84. Mutie, FM, Gao, L-L, Kathambi, V, Rono, PC, Musili, PM, Ngugi, G, Hu, G-W and Wang, Q-F. 2020. An ethnobotanical survey of a dryland botanical garden and its environs in Kenya: the Mutomo hill plant sanctuary. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, 1–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/1543831 

  85. Neumann, FH and Bamford, MK. 2015. Shaping of modern southern African biomes: Neogene vegetation and climate changes. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa, 70(3): 195–212. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0035919X.2015.1072859 

  86. Okoye, JI and Ene, GI. 2018. Effects of processing on the nutrient and anti-nutrient contents of tiger nut (Cyperus esculentus Lativum). Journal of Food Technology and Food Chemistry, 1: 101 

  87. Omode, AA, Fatoki, OS and Olaogun, KA. 1995. Physicochemical properties of some underexploited and nonconventional oilseeds. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 43(11): 2850–2853. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/jf00059a015 

  88. Otunola, GA and Afolayan, AJ. 2019. Proximate and elemental composition of leaf, corm, root and peel of Hypoxis hemerocallidea: A Southern African multipurpose medicinal plant. Pakistan journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 32(2): 535–439. 

  89. Partridge, TC, Werdelin, L and Sanders, WJ. 2010. Tectonics and geomorphology of Africa during the Phanerozoic. In Werdelin, L and Sanders, WJ (eds.), Cenozoic Mammals of Africa, 3–26. Berkeley: University of California Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520257214.003.0001 

  90. Peters, CR, O’Brien, EM and Drummond, RB. 1992. Edible Wild Plants of Sub-Saharan Africa. Kew: Royal Botanic Gardens. 

  91. Peters, CR and Vogel, JC. 2005. Africa’s wild C4 plant foods and possible early hominid diets. Journal of Human Evolution, 48(3): 219–236. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.11.003 

  92. Reed, KE. 1997. Early hominid evolution and ecological change through the African Plio-Pleistocene. Journal of Human Evolution, 32(2–3): 289–322. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jhev.1996.0106 

  93. Reynolds, SC, Bailey, GN and King, GC. 2011. Landscapes and their relation to hominin habitats: Case studies from Australopithecus sites in eastern and southern Africa. Journal of Human Evolution, 60(3): 281–298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2010.10.001 

  94. Reynolds, SC and Kibii, JM. 2011. Sterkfontein at 75: Review of paleoenvironments, fauna, dating and archaeology from the hominin site of Sterkfontein (Gauteng Province, South Africa). Palaeontologia Africana, 46: 59–88. 

  95. Roberts, M and Roberts, S. 2017. Indigenous Healing Plants. Pretoria: Briza Publishers. 

  96. Sage, RF. 2017. A portrait of the C4 photosynthetic family on the 50th anniversary of its discovery: Species number, evolutionary lineages, and Hall of Fame. Journal of Experimental Botany, 68(2): e11–e28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx005 

  97. Sánchez‐Zapata, E, Fernández‐López, J and Pérez‐Alvarez, JA. 2012. Tiger nut (Cyperus esculentus) commercialization: Health aspects, composition, properties, and food applications. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 11(4): 366–377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2012.00190.x 

  98. Schoeninger, MJ, Bunn, HT, Murray, SS and Marlett, JA. 2001. Composition of tubers used by Hadza foragers of Tanzania. Journal of Food composition and Analysis, 14(1): 15–25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/jfca.2000.0961 

  99. Schreier, AL. 2010. Feeding ecology, food availability and ranging patterns of wild hamadryas baboons at Filoha. Folia Primatologica, 81(3): 129–145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000316562 

  100. Scott, L. 2002. Grassland development under glacial and interglacial conditions in southern Africa: Review of pollen, phytolith and isotope evidence. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 177(1–2): 47–57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0031-0182(01)00351-0 

  101. Scott, RS, Ungar, PS, Bergstrom, TS, Brown, CA, Grine, FE, Teaford, MF and Walker, A. 2005. Dental microwear texture analysis shows within-species diet variability in fossil hominins. Nature, 436(7051): 693–695. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03822 

  102. Siebert, F and Siebert, SJ. 2005. Dolomitic vegetation of the Sterkfontein Caves World Heritage Site and its importance in the conservation of Rocky Highveld Grassland. Koedoe, 48(1): 17–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/koedoe.v48i1.163 

  103. Sievers, C. 2015. Nuts for dinner? Cladium mariscus in the Middle Stone Age at Sibudu, South Africa. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa, 70(3): 213–218. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0035919X.2014.996919 

  104. Smith, CA. 1966. Common names of South African plants. Pretoria: Department of Agricultural Technical Services. 

  105. Sonnenberg, BJ and Botha, CEJ. 1992. An investigation of leaf-blade anatomy and photosynthetic characteristics of four Cyperaceae species from the Albany and Bathurst Districts in the Eastern Cape. South African Journal of Botany, 58(5): 297–303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0254-6299(16)30814-6 

  106. Sponheimer, M. 2013. Some ruminations on australopith diets. In Reed, KE, Fleagle, JG and Leakey, RE (eds.), The Paleobiology of Australopithecus, 225–233. Dordrecht: Springe. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5919-0_15 

  107. Sponheimer, M, Alemseged, Z, Cerling, TE, Grine, FE, Kimbel, WH, Leakey, MG, Lee-Thorp, JA, Manthi, FK, Reed, KE, Wood, BA and Wynn, JG. 2013. Isotopic evidence of early hominin diets. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(26): 10513–10518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222579110 

  108. Sponheimer, M, Lee-Thorp, J, de Ruiter, D, Codron, D, Codron, J, Baugh, AT and Thackeray, F. 2005. Hominins, sedges, and termites: New carbon isotope data from the Sterkfontein valley and Kruger National Park. Journal of Human Evolution, 48(3): 301–312. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.11.008 

  109. Stewart, KM. 2014. Environmental change and hominin exploitation of C4-based resources in wetland/savanna mosaics. Journal of Human Evolution, 77: 1–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.10.003 

  110. Stoller, EW and Wax, LM. 1973. Yellow nutsedge shoot emergence and tuber longevity. Weed Science, 21(1): 76–81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S004317450003174X 

  111. Story, R. 1958. Some plants used by the Bushmen in obtaining food or water. Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa 30. Pretoria: South African Department of Agriculture. 

  112. Swedell, L, Hailemeskel, G and Schreier, A. 2008. Composition and seasonality of diet in wild hamadryas baboons: Preliminary findings from Filoha. Folia Primatologica, 79(6): 476–490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000164431 

  113. Tanaka, J. 1976. Subsistence ecology of Central Kalahari San. In Lee, RB and De Vore, I (eds.), Kalahari Hunter-gatherers: Studies of the! Kung San and their Neighbours. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 

  114. Thunberg, CP. 1794–95. Travels at the Cape of Good Hope (1772–1775). London. 

  115. Tumbleson, ME and Kommedahl, T. 1961. Reproductive potential of Cyperus esculentus by tubers. Weeds, 9(4): 646–653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/4040817 

  116. Ukwuru, MU, Ibeneme, CL and Agbo, GI. 2011. New product development from tigernut (Cyperus esculentus) and their sensory, proximate and microbiological evaluation. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition, 10(2): 101–105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3923/pjn.2011.101.105 

  117. Ungar, PS, Grine, FE and Teaford, MF. 2008. Dental microwear and diet of the Plio-Pleistocene hominin Paranthropus boisei. PLoS One, 3(4): e2044. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0002044 

  118. Ungar, PS and Sponheimer, M. 2011. The diets of early hominins. Science, 334(6053): 190–193. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207701 

  119. Van Casteren, A, Strait, DS, Swain, MV, Michael, S, Thai, LA, Philip, SM, Saji, S, Al-Fadhalah, K, Almusallam, AS, Shekeban, A and McGraw, WS. 2020. Hard plant tissues do not contribute meaningfully to dental microwear: Evolutionary implications. Scientific Reports, 10(1): 1–9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-57403-w 

  120. Van Damme, P, Van Den Eynden, V and Vernemmen, P. 1922. Plant uses by the Topnaar of the Sesfontein area (Namib Desert). Afrika Focus, 8(3–4): 253–281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/2031356X-0080304006 

  121. Van der Merwe, NJ, Masao, FT and Bamford, MK. 2008. Isotopic evidence for contrasting diets of early hominins Homo habilis and Australopithecus boisei of Tanzania. South African Journal of Science, 104(3): 153–155. 

  122. Van Ginkel, CE and Cilliers, CJ. 2020. Aquatic and Wetland Plants of Southern Africa. Pretoria: Briza Publications. 

  123. Van Wyk, BE and Gericke, N. 2000. People’s plants: A guide to useful plants of Southern Africa. Pretoria: Briza publications. 

  124. Vega-Morales, T, Mateos-Diaz, C, Perez-Machin, R, Wiebe, J, Gericke, NP, Alarcon, C and Lopez-Romero, JM. 2019. Chemical composition of industrially and laboratory processed Cyperus esculentus rhizomes. Food Chemistry, 297: 124896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.05.170 

  125. Verloove, F. 2014. A conspectus of Cyperus sl (Cyperaceae) in Europe (incl. Azores, Madeira and Canary Islands), with emphasis on non-native naturalized species. Webbia, 69(2): 179–223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00837792.2014.975013 

  126. Vincent, AS. 1985. Plant foods in savanna environments: A preliminary report of tubers eaten by the Hadza of northern Tanzania. World Archaeology, 17(2): 131–148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1985.9979958 

  127. Vinnicombe, P. 1976. People of the Eland: Rock Paintings of the Drakensberg Bushmen as a Reflection of their Life and Thought. Pietermaritzburg: University of Natal Press. 

  128. Von Koenen, E. 2001. Medicinal, Poisonous, and Edible Plants in Namibia. Windhoek: Klaus Hess Publishers. 

  129. Wadley, L. 1978. Later Stone Age Hunters and Gatherers of the Southern Transvaal: Social and Ecological Interpretation. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports Vol. 25. 

  130. Watson, V. 1993. Composition of the Swartkrans bone accumulations, in terms of skeletal parts and animals represented. In: Brain, CK (ed.), Swartkrans: A Cave’s Chronicle of Early Man, 35–73. Pretoria: Transvaal Museum. 

  131. Watt, JM and Breyer-Brandwijk, MG. 1962. The Medicinal and Poisonous Plants of Southern and Easthern Africa. Edinburgh: E. & S. Livingstone. 

  132. Wehmeyer, AS. 1986. Edible wild plants of southern Africa: data on the nutrient contents of over 300 species. Bothalia, 14: 613–615. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/abc.v14i3/4.1217 

  133. Welcome, AK and van Wyk, BE. 2019. An inventory and analysis of the food plants of southern Africa. South African Journal of Botany, 122: 136–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajb.2018.11.003 

  134. Wrangham, R, Cheney, D, Seyfarth, R and Sarmiento, E. 2009. Shallow‐water habitats as sources of fallback foods for hominins. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 140(4): 630–642. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21122 

comments powered by Disqus