Start Submission Become a Reviewer

Reading: Tertiary Dentine Frequencies in Extant Great Apes and Fossil Hominins

Download

A- A+
Alt. Display

Research paper

Tertiary Dentine Frequencies in Extant Great Apes and Fossil Hominins

Author:

Ian Towle

Research Centre in Evolutionary Anthropology and Palaeoecology, School of Natural Sciences and Psychology, John Moores University, Liverpool, GB
X close

Abstract

Tertiary dentine forms when an odontoblast is directly affected by stimuli, commonly through occlusal wear and caries. In this study the presence of tertiary dentine was recorded in three South African fossil hominin species (Australopithecus africanus, Homo naledi and Paranthropus robustus), and two extant great ape species (Gorilla gorilla gorilla and Pan troglodytes). Frequencies of tertiary dentine were calculated for each species based on macroscopic observations of teeth with dentine exposed through occlusal wear. Overall, the three hominin species have similar tertiary dentine frequencies ranging from 12% to 16.13%. In contrast, over 90% of permanent gorilla teeth with dentine visible show tertiary dentine. Chimpanzees fall between these extremes, with 47.21% of permanent teeth affected. Deciduous teeth follow the same pattern. Species variances are not related to differences in occlusal wear. Instead, some species appear predisposed to produce tertiary dentine earlier/faster, or more often, than other species. Therefore, tertiary dentine formation has the potential to provide useful information on fossil specimens. For example, the uniformly low frequency of tertiary dentine formation in hominins may relate to diet, or be due to thick enamel having a similar role in preventing loss of function of teeth, i.e., extending the life of a tooth. In contrast, tertiary dentine is clearly an important mechanism for normal dental function in gorillas, and may have evolved to help maintain shearing function.

How to Cite: Towle, I., 2019. Tertiary Dentine Frequencies in Extant Great Apes and Fossil Hominins. Open Quaternary, 5(1), p.2. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/oq.48
216
Views
56
Downloads
15
Twitter
  Published on 20 Mar 2019
 Accepted on 18 Feb 2019            Submitted on 14 Aug 2018

1. Introduction

Primary dentine is produced during tooth formation by odontoblasts and is succeeded by secondary dentine, which is an ongoing, slow process (Rutherford et al. 1995; Dean, 2017; Zuo et al. 2018). Tertiary dentine forms as protection against insult, caused commonly by excessive wear, microbial infection, and caries (Bjørndal, 2001; Fischer et al. 1970; Foster et al. 2013; Mjör & Karlsen, 1970; Ricucci et al. 2014; Stanley et al. 1966; Wennberg et al. 1983). As there is often confusion as to what this process should be called, it is referred to in this study as ‘tertiary dentine’ following Foster et al. (2013). The terms ‘sclerotic dentine’, ‘irregular secondary dentine’ and ‘reparative dentine’ have all also been used in the literature to describe this phenomenon (e.g., Ortner, 2003; Hillson, 2005; Dean, 2017; Stanley et al. 1983).

Tertiary dentine can be formed in two ways: reactionary dentine occurs when new dentine forms from the pre-existing odontoblasts; and reparative, in which new odontoblast cells are formed (Ricucci et al. 2014; Carvalho and Lussi, 2017). In both types, tertiary dentine forms when teeth are directly affected by stimuli such as occlusal wear or caries, but microscopically the structure and characteristics of these different types varies (Goldberg, 2014; Neves and Sharpe, 2018). Which type of tertiary dentine forms depends on the severity and position of the stimuli (Schüpbach et al. 1992; Carvalho and Lussi, 2017; Goldberg, 2014). Occlusal wear can lead to the exposure of the primary dentine and, if the wear is severe, tertiary dentine may form as a mechanism to protect the pulp chamber (Geissler et al. 2015; Pampush et al. 2016; Zuo et al. 2018). The other main factor that can cause tertiary dentine is caries. Caries affects under 5% of teeth in these samples (Towle, 2017), and tertiary dentine in carious teeth are typically within a deep cavity and therefore only visible on CT scans or in histological specimens.

A key diagnostic feature of tertiary dentine is that the color is distinct, and usually darker in appearance (Hillson, 2005). Therefore, from a macroscopic perspective, tertiary dentine is easily discernable as dark patches, usually visible in the same positions on the occlusal surface i.e., as an island on the occlusal surface above the pulp chamber. Pulp exposure can also lead to dark discoloration (Oxford, 2014). An easy macroscopic way to differentiate between tertiary dentine and pulp exposure is that the former is present on a flush surface, whereas a necrotic pulp generally has a depression in the dentine at the location of the pulp.

The microanatomy of tertiary dentine has been researched in both humans and non-human animals. In particular, clinical studies have researched the properties of tertiary dentine formation, usually from an oral health perspective (Cox et al. 1992; Smith et al. 1994; Tarim et al. 1998; Ivanovic and Santini, 1989; Neves and Sharpe, 2018). In addition to darker coloration, tertiary dentine has fewer tubules and is denser in structure than primary dentine (Zuo et al. 2018). The type of stimuli causing tertiary dentine formation influences the structure and positon of deposits, and in general tertiary dentine prevalence and intensity increase with age in humans (Stanley et al. 1983; Carvalho and Lussi, 2017). Tertiary dentine is rarely reported in fossil hominins (Margvelashvili et al. 2013). Similarly, comparative studies have yet to be carried out on primates, although clinical studies involving specific captive non-human primates have been conducted (e.g., Duque et al. 2006; Rutherford et al. 1995). It is not known how the prevalence at different ages of tertiary dentine formation varies among wild primate groups or if certain groups may start to produce this form of dentine in response to stimuli at earlier ages than others. Specific genetic changes in animal models can increase tertiary dentine production (Neves and Sharpe, 2018). Therefore, it seems plausible that certain species may have evolved to produce this type of dentine in response to specific stimuli, such as a diet that leads to extreme occlusal wear.

This study compares the prevalence of macroscopically-visible tertiary dentine in extant great apes and fossil hominins species using qualitative methods. The aim is firstly to see how variable hominids are in terms of tertiary dentine frequencies and secondly to test whether differences in formation frequencies may relate to diet or phylogeny across the five species studied. Since tertiary dentine forms as a response to stimuli, production may begin at earlier ages, or form more quickly, in species that have evolved to cope with abrasive or tough diets. Therefore, it is hypothesized that tertiary dentine frequencies will vary substantially with diet, with distinct differences between hominin genera, since dietary differences among these groups is well documented (Ungar and Grine, 1991; Towle et al. 2018; Daegling et al. 2013).

2. Materials and methods

Data were collected on South African fossil hominins (Paranthropus robustus, Australopithecus africanus and Homo naledi) and two extant great ape species (Gorilla gorilla gorilla and Pan troglodytes). The fossil hominin samples are curated at The Ditsong National Museum of Natural History in Pretoria and the University of the Witwatersrand in Johannesburg, South Africa. The extant primate material is curated at the Powell-Cotton Museum in Kent, UK, and specimens were shot in the wild in the first half of the 20th century (Guatelli-Steinberg and Skinner, 2000; Macho and Lee-Thorp, 2014). When stated as chimpanzees or gorillas this refers to common chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) respectively. Chimpanzees and gorillas were chosen to compare to the fossil hominin due to the abundance of dietary data, and because of their close phylogenetic relationships. Additionally, there are substantial differences in diet between gorillas and chimpanzees, meaning dietary influences on tertiary dentine frequencies should be clear. In particular, compared with chimpanzees, gorillas infrequently consume hard seeds and fruits, and instead eat large volumes of low-quality herbaceous vegetation (Conklin-Brittain, Knott, & Wrangham, 2001; Doran et al. 2002; Galbany et al. 2016).

A tooth was recorded in one of four categories: (1) no dentine exposed through wear, (2) dentine exposed through wear but no tertiary dentine present, (3) dentine exposed through wear and tertiary dentine visible, and (4) tooth not recorded due to postmortem damage. Only teeth that have dentine exposed on the occlusal surface through wear and are not damaged or obscured by postmortem damage were included in analysis, i.e., (2) and (3). Tertiary dentine was recorded as any obvious coloration changes, compared to primary dentine, that are clearly antemortem in nature (Figure 1). Occlusal wear typically creates a flat surface, in which tertiary dentine islands are clearly visible. The dark coloration of tertiary dentine is usually visible on specific positions on the occlusal surface, in particular directly above the pulp chamber (Hillson, 2005). Only clear areas of tertiary dentine that are visible with the naked eye were included. The severity of occlusal wear for each tooth was recorded following Scott (1979) for molars and Smith (1984) for all teeth as part of a separate study (Towle, 2017), allowing differences in wear between species to be examined. Statistical significance was tested between species using a chi-square test of homogeneity, with significance set at the ≤0.05 alpha level.

Figure 1 

A)Pan troglodytes lower right deciduous central incisor (specimen MER ii 27); B)Paranthropus robustus lower right central incisor (specimen SKX 3559); C)Gorilla gorilla gorilla lower left first premolar (specimen M 786); D)Pan troglodytes mandible (specimen M 425); E)Australopithecus africanus lower left teeth (specimen STS 7); F) Gorilla mandible (specimen ZI 17). White arrows indicate positon of tertiary dentine.

Half of the teeth in the collections studied show primary dentine exposure through antemortem wear. A major issue in comparing frequencies of tertiary dentine is the amount of postmortem discoloration on many hominin teeth. Particularly common is for dentine islands on the occlusal surface to be stained but for the surrounding enamel to appear relatively unaffected (Figure 2). This staining is caused by taphonomic processes and involves the entire dentine surface and therefore does not resemble tertiary dentine. Teeth with such staining are excluded from analysis. The large size of the three collections of fossil hominin species studied means there is still a large sample for each. All tooth types from both the mandible and maxilla were examined, including both deciduous and permanent dentitions for the extant great ape samples, but just permanent teeth for the hominins due to sample sizes (Additional files 1 and 2). Table 1 shows the number of permanent teeth studied for each sample. Tertiary dentine forms similarly in deciduous teeth as in permanent teeth, although there are likely differences in certain characteristics (Klinge, 2001). Antimeres are included in frequencies and results are displayed per tooth rather than individual.

Figure 2 

Paranthropus robustus left upper first molar (specimen SK 57). Postmortem coloration covering a dentine island (white arrow).

Table 1

Number of permanent teeth for all samples studied, split by mandible and maxilla, as well as tooth type. M: molars; PR: premolars; C: canines; I: incisors.

Species Maxilla Mandible

M PM C I M PM C I

Pan troglodytes 501 292 136 315 497 300 140 320
Gorilla gorilla gorilla 409 247 110 271 411 241 113 288
Paranthropus robustus 78 63 15 38 117 58 10 23
Australopithecus africanus 81 55 20 31 153 65 36 36
Homo naledi 31 21 13 14 28 19 11 19

3. Results

The three hominin species have very similar tertiary dentine frequencies, ranging from 12.00% to 16.13% in permanent teeth (Table 2), with no statistically significant differences among them (e.g., P. robustus vs. H. naledi: X2 = 0.326, 1 df, p = 0.5679). Gorillas have the highest prevalence with over 90% of permanent teeth with exposed primary dentine showing tertiary dentine islands. For chimpanzees, 47.21% of permanent teeth are affected. Deciduous teeth show the same pattern in great apes, with gorillas having the highest frequency (Table 3). There were not enough complete deciduous teeth with dentine exposed for the hominin samples for comparisons.

Table 2

Frequencies of tertiary dentine in permanent teeth. Only teeth with dentine exposed through wear on the occlusal surface included.

Species Tertiary dentine present No tertiary dentine Tertiary dentine %

A. africanus 12 78 13.33
P. robustus 9 66 12.00
H. naledi 5 26 16.13
P. troglodytes 448 501 47.21
G. g. gorilla 917 67 93.19

Table 3

Frequencies of tertiary dentine in deciduous teeth. Only teeth with dentine exposed through wear on the occlusal surface included.

Species Tertiary dentine presen No tertiary dentine Tertiary dentine %

P. troglodytes 113 128 46.89
G. g. gorilla 131 61 68.23

Figure 1 presents examples of tertiary dentine in different species (A-C). This figure also highlights the severity of tertiary dentine in chimpanzees (D), compared to the lack of tertiary dentine in a similarly worn hominin sample (E). Figure 1 also demonstrates that gorillas produce far more tertiary dentine for any given amount of occlusal wear than any hominin and chimpanzees (F). Differences in wear between species do not explain the large differences in tertiary dentine frequencies, with wear score proportions being similar among all species studied (Table 4; Towle, 2017). Figure 1 also highlights the difference in coloration of Tertiary dentine between samples, which is likely a consequence of structural differences. Interestingly, nearly all the gorilla examples are extremely dark, which may be caused by the amount of tertiary dentine formed or perhaps a denser tertiary dentine structure. A histological study is needed to provide further insight into the differences in properties of tertiary dentine between species.

Table 4

Combined maxilla and mandible mean wear scores for each species split by tooth type. Anterior teeth and premolars are recorded following Smith (1984) and molars following Scott (1979).

Species I1 I2 C PM3 PM4 M1 M2 M3

P. troglodytes 4.69 4.30 3.67 2.88 2.85 4.01 3.99 3.60
G. g. gorilla 3.86 3.36 3.35 2.61 2.68 4.36 3.67 3.47
P. robustus 3.32 3.00 2.82 2.83 2.95 4.04 3.64 2.98
A. africanus 3.60 2.85 3.28 2.85 2.88 4.10 3.67 2.89
H. naledi 4.13 2.56 2.96 3.11 3.40 3.92 3.11 3.19

4. Discussion

Tertiary dentine is known to form as a response to stimuli, including occlusal wear (Bjørndal, 2001; Foster et al. 2013; Mjör & Karlsen, 1970; Stanley et al. 1966; Wennberg et al. 1983). However, whether species differences in tertiary dentine exist, and what may cause these differences, has rarely been explored. The results of this study show that diverse hominin species, from three genera, have similar, low, tertiary dentine frequencies. This is despite disparity in other dental properties, and dietary differences between these three genera (e.g., Towle et al. 2017; Ungar and Grine, 1991; Grine et al. 2012; Smith et al. 2015; Daegling et al. 2013). The hypothesis that differences in diet have led to substantially different tertiary dentine frequencies in hominins therefore seems unlikely. Instead, tertiary dentine is much more common in other great apes. This may relate to evolving to cope with different diets, or different ways to cope with similar dietary items. It may also relate to other features such as environment factors and exogenous grit. Therefore, diet may be important for controlling tertiary dentine rate on an evolutionary scale, especially in particular species, but in hominins either there has not been enough time for differences to evolve, or other mechanisms are more important.

For example, tertiary dentine formation may be less common in hominins as a whole, with thick enamel potentially being responsible for extending tooth functionality, most notably in species such as P. robustus. Another possibility is that because the hominin species studied here shared a recent common ancestor, differences in tertiary dentine formation had not had sufficient time to evolve. This could be tested by seeing if separate groups of captive primates of the same species, but with different diets, show different tertiary dentine frequencies. If not, this would suggest tertiary dentine is an evolutionary adaptation and not simply a consequence of an individual’s diet.

Tertiary dentine differences between species are not related to tooth wear, with all species represented by similar proportions of wear stages that all cluster around the same mean. The deciduous teeth for the extant primate sample follow the same pattern as the permanent teeth, again suggesting species differences in the age at which tertiary dentine is formed. Differences in the speed of occlusal wear between species have been suggested as potentially influencing tertiary dentine formation, with wear that occurs too quickly potentially not allowing enough time for tertiary dentine to form (Fischer et al. 1970; Foster et al. 2013; Mjör & Karlsen, 1970; Ricucci et al. 2014; Stanley et al. 1966; Wennberg et al. 1983). The results of this study suggest that dentine properties are also crucially important, with certain species, such as gorillas, laying down tertiary dentine at earlier ages compared to other species. This likely relates to evolving mechanisms to produce new dentine in response to stimuli (Neves and Sharpe, 2018). Further histological studies are needed to support this finding, as this will allow microstructure differences to be compared (Smith et al. 1994; Tarim et al. 1998; Ivanovic and Santini, 1989; Stanley et al. 1983; Carvalho and Lussi, 2017).

A potential explanation for the substantially different prevalence of tertiary dentine formation in hominids is evolving dental properties to cope with different diets. The high prevalence of tertiary dentine formation in gorillas has potentially evolved as a consequence of their diet high in tough vegetation, in which early/more tertiary dentine formation keeps the tooth functioning for longer. This hypothesis fits with other research that has found that, unlike other folivorous primates, mountain gorillas retain dental shearing function with age (Glowacka et al. 2016). However, the severe macrowear observed in western lowland gorillas compared to mountain gorillas has led researchers to suggest exogenous grit may be an important factor (Galbany et al. 2016). When frequencies for different hominin groups have been researched further conclusions on what the low frequency may mean in terms of diet can be explored. Additionally, once more extant primate species have been studied, and presuming dietary differences explain variation in tertiary dentine occurrence, inferences into the diet of fossil samples may be possible.

Additional Files

The additional files for this article can be found as follows:

Tertiary dentine in permanent teeth

Raw data for all permanent teeth studied. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/oq.48.S1

Tertiary dentine in deciduous teeth

Raw data for all deciduous teeth studied. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/oq.48.S2

Acknowledgements

The author thanks L. Berger and B. Zipfel from the University of the Witwatersrand, I. Livne from the Powell-Cotton Museum, and S. Potze from The Ditsong Museum of South Africa for access to their collections. This research was supported by a studentship from Liverpool John Moores University.

Competing Interests

The author has no competing interests to declare.

References

  1. Bjørndal, L. 2001. Presence or absence of tertiary dentinogenesis in relation to caries progression. Advances in Dental Research, 15(1): 80–83. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374010150012101 

  2. Carvalho, TS and Lussi, A. 2017. Age-related morphological, histological and functional changes in teeth. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 44(4): 291–298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.12474 

  3. Conklin-Brittain, NL, Knott, CD and Wrangham, RW. 2001. The feeding ecology of apes. The apes: Challenges for the 21st century, 167–174. 

  4. Cox, CE, White, KC, Ramus, DL, Farmer, JB and Snuggs, HM. 1992. Reparative dentin: Factors affecting its deposition. Quintessence International, 23(4). 

  5. Daegling, DJ, Judex, S, Ozcivici, E, Ravosa, MJ, Taylor, AB, Grine, FE and Ungar, PS. 2013. Viewpoints: Feeding mechanics, diet, and dietary adaptations in early hominins. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 151(3): 356–371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22281 

  6. Dean, C. 2017. How the microstructure of dentine can contribute to reconstructing developing dentitions and the lives of hominoids and hominins. Comptes Rendus Palevol, 16(5–6): 557–571. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crpv.2016.10.006 

  7. Doran, DM, McNeilage, A, Greer, D, Bocian, C, Mehlman, P and Shah, N. 2002. Western lowland gorilla diet and resource availability: New evidence, cross-site comparisons, and reflections on indirect sampling methods. American Journal of Primatology, 58(3): 91–116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.10053 

  8. Duque, C, Hebling, J, Smith, AJ, Giro, EMA, Oliveira, MF and de Souza Costa, CA. 2006. Reactionary dentinogenesis after applying restorative materials and bioactive dentin matrix molecules as liners in deep cavities prepared in nonhuman primate teeth. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 33(6): 452–461. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2842.2005.01585.x 

  9. Fischer, FM, El-Kafrawy, A and Mitchell, DF. 1970. Studies of tertiary dentin in monkey teeth using vital dyes. Journal of Dental Research, 49(6): 1537–1540. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345700490066501 

  10. Foster, BL, Nociti, FH and Somerman, MJ. 2013. Tooth root development. Stem Cells in Craniofacial Development and Regeneration, 153–177. 

  11. Galbany, J, Imanizabayo, O, Romero, A, Vecellio, V, Glowacka, H, Cranfield, MR, McFarlin, SC, et al. 2016. Tooth wear and feeding ecology in mountain gorillas from Volcanoes National Park, Rwanda. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 159(3): 457–465. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22897 

  12. Geissler, E, Duque, AC, Pampush, JD, Daegling, DJ and Mcgraw, WS. 2015. Spatial variation of dentine hardness in the molars of three primate taxa. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 156: 142–142. 

  13. Glowacka, H, McFarlin, SC, Catlett, KK, Mudakikwa, A, Bromage, TG, Cranfield, MR, Schwartz, GT, et al. 2016. Age-related changes in molar topography and shearing crest length in a wild population of mountain Gorillas from Volcanoes National Park, Rwanda. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 160(1): 3–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22943 

  14. Goldberg, M. 2014. Reactionary and reparative dentin-like structures. In: The Dental Pulp, 141–154. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-55160-4_10 

  15. Grine, FE, Sponheimer, M, Ungar, PS, Lee-Thorp, J and Teaford, MF. 2012. Dental microwear and stable isotopes inform the paleoecology of extinct hominins. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 148(2): 285–317. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22086 

  16. Guatelli-Steinberg, D and Skinner, M. 2000. Prevalence and etiology of linear enamel hypoplasia in monkeys and apes from Asia and Africa. Folia Primatologica, 71(3): 115–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000021740 

  17. Hillson, S. 2005. Teeth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614477 

  18. Ivanovic, V and Santini, A. 1989. Rate of formation of tertiary dentin in dogs’ teeth in response to lining materials. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 67(6): 684–688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(89)90009-1 

  19. Klinge, RF. 2001. Further observations on tertiary dentin in human deciduous teeth. Advances in Dental Research, 15(1): 76–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/08959374010150011901 

  20. Macho, GA and Lee-Thorp, JA. 2014. Niche partitioning in sympatric Gorilla and Pan from Cameroon: Implications for life history strategies and for reconstructing the evolution of hominin life history. PLOS One, 9(7): e102794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102794 

  21. Margvelashvili, A, Zollikofer, CP, Lordkipanidze, D, Peltomäki, T and de León, MSP. 2013. Tooth wear and dentoalveolar remodeling are key factors of morphological variation in the Dmanisi mandibles. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(43): 17278–17283. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1316052110 

  22. Mjör, IA and Karlsen, K. 1970. The interface between dentine and irregular secondary dentine. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica, 28(3): 363–376. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/00016357009032040 

  23. Neves, VCM and Sharpe, PT. 2018. Regulation of Reactionary Dentine Formation. Journal of Dental Research, 97(4): 416–422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022034517743431 

  24. Ortner, DJ. 2003. Identification of pathological conditions in human skeletal remains. Cambridge: Academic Press. 

  25. Oxford, M. 2014. Tooth trauma: Pathology and the treatment options. In Practice, 36(1): 2–14. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/inp.f7208 

  26. Pampush, JD, Spradley, JP, Morse, PE, Harrington, AR, Allen, KL, Boyer, DM and Kay, RF. 2016. Wear and its effects on dental topography measures in howling monkeys (Alouatta palliata). American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 161(4): 705–721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23077 

  27. Ricucci, D, Loghin, S, Lin, LM, Spångberg, LS and Tay, FR. 2014. Is hard tissue formation in the dental pulp after the death of the primary odontoblasts a regenerative or a reparative process? Journal of Dentistry, 42(9): 1156–1170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2014.06.012 

  28. Rutherford, B, Spångberg, L, Tucker, M and Charette, M. 1995. Transdentinal stimulation of reparative dentine formation by osteogenic protein-1 in monkeys. Archives of Oral Biology, 40(7): 681–683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(95)00020-P 

  29. Schüpbach, P, Lutz, F and Guggenheim, B. 1992. Human root caries: Histopathology of arrested lesions. Caries Research, 26(3): 153–164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000261436 

  30. Scott, EC. 1979. Dental wear scoring technique. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 51(2): 213–217. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330510208 

  31. Smith, AJ, Tobias, RS, Cassidy, N, Plant, CG, Browne, RM, Begue-Kirn, C, Lesot, H, et al. 1994. Odontoblast stimulation in ferrets by dentine matrix components. Archives of Oral Biology, 39(1): 13–22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-9969(94)90029-9 

  32. Smith, BH. 1984. Patterns of molar wear in hunter–gatherers and agriculturalists. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 63(1): 39–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.1330630107 

  33. Smith, TM, Tafforeau, P, Le Cabec, A, Bonnin, A, Houssaye, A, Pouech, J and Menter, CG. 2015. Dental ontogeny in Pliocene and early Pleistocene hominins. PLOS One, 10(2): e0118118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0118118 

  34. Stanley, HR, Pereira, JC, Spiegel, E, Broom, C and Schultz, M. 1983. The detection and prevalence of reactive and physiologic sclerotic dentin, reparative dentin and dead tracts beneath various types of dental lesions according to tooth surface and age. Journal of Oral Pathology & Medicine, 12(4): 257–289. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0714.1983.tb00338.x 

  35. Stanley, HR, White, CL and McCray, L. 1966. The rate of tertiary (reparative) dentine formation in the human tooth. Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, 21(2): 180–189. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(66)90240-4 

  36. Tarim, B, Hafez, AA and Cox, CF. 1998. Pulpal response to a resin-modified glass-ionomer material on nonexposed and exposed monkey pulps. Quintessence International, 29(8). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23250 

  37. Towle, IE. 2017. Dental pathology, wear and developmental defects in South African hominins (Doctoral dissertation, Liverpool John Moores University). 

  38. Towle, I, Irish, JD and De Groote, I. 2017. Behavioral inferences from the high levels of dental chipping in Homo naledi. American journal of physical anthropology, 164(1): 184–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23250 

  39. Towle, I, Irish, JD, Elliott, M and De Groote, I. 2018. Root grooves on two adjacent anterior teeth of Australopithecus africanus. International Journal of Paleopathology, 22: 163–167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpp.2018.02.004 

  40. Ungar, PS and Grine, FE. 1991. Incisor size and wear in Australopithecus africanus and Paranthropus robustus. Journal of Human Evolution, 20(4): 313–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0047-2484(91)90013-L 

  41. Wennberg, A, Mjör, IA and Hensten-Pettersen, A. 1983. Biological evaluation of dental restorative materials-a comparison of different test methods. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 17(1): 23–36. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820170103 

  42. Zuo, J, Zhen, J, Wang, F, Li, Y and Zhou, Z. 2018. Effect of Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound on the Expression of Calcium Ion Transport-Related Proteins during Tertiary Dentin Formation. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, 44(1): 223–233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2017.09.006 

comments powered by Disqus